https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Watkins_(businessman)

In 1998 or 1999, during the dot-com boom, Watkins left the army to focus on N.T. Technology.[4] In October 2020, Mother Jones reported that N.T. Technology has hosted domains with names suggesting connections to child pornography, and that regardless of whether child pornography is hosted on the domains, Watkins is "profiting from words that appeal to the real thing". [11][12] Watkins dismissed the claim as "an attempt to smear [his] name and print something awful".[11]

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/jim-watkins-child-pornography-domains/

While Mother Jones did not visit the domains because of strict laws related to viewing child sex abuse material, internet registration and hosting data suggest at a minimum that Watkins profited from domains with names explicitly related to pedophilia—the very thing that QAnon followers say that they’re motivated to end. The domains’ names include terms such as “preteen,” “schoolgirl,” and “child” alongside graphic terms for genitalia and words like “rape” and “love.” It’s unclear what, if anything, is currently being served at the domains. However, an analysis of metadata collected years ago from one by archive.org shows dozens of filenames and links containing highly suggestive terms, including “xxxpreteen,” “children,” and sexual references to girls aged 12 to 15.

Some of the domains date back to the late 1990s and may no longer be active, while others currently resolve to IP addresses controlled by Watkins’ company, N.T. Technology, according to records compiled by Farsight Security, a cybersecurity company that archives historical routing data detailing relationships among domain names, IP addresses, name servers, and other digital assets. N.T. Technology “hosted many domains with CP [child pornography] themed names over an extended period of time.”

If this is all untrue why has Jim not sued Wikipedia and Mother Jones to have the information removed??? Wouldn't it make sense to sue them and have it removed if your son is running for office and the information is false? Jim is a public figure, this would be a libel case, Jim loves to sue people. What's he waiting for… maybe he fears discovery?