TYB
>teachers got too lazy to grade actual exams (question followed by blank page), and replaced them with multiple-guess true false maybe quizzes, than graded THOSE on a curve.
Anon had a sociology prof in college who took it a step further, and made it a true bell curve with no moar than 2% getting an A.
>the high score was a 39/200. the prof was the one that determined the "curve" and gave the letter grades. the 39/200 got an A. a C letter grade was 9/200.
Fair enough.
The sociology prof anon mentioned gave commie slanted exams where the answer needed to fit his agenda, then graded on curve, so a 95% would often be a C.
You had to read into the rants on stuff like garages facing the street being a menace to society to even have a hope of passing.
Ahead of his time with social credit scoring, I suppose.
I can't imagine how much worse it's gotten in the decades since.
>would be nice to see a cat sticker on every bumper now instead of the punisher skull or the letter ‘Q’
Radicalizing cats as right wing propaganda would be funny AF.
>"social sciences" should not even be in the curriculum offered in a university. if there is not one universally acknowledged correct answer, and all others answers wrong, then it's nothing more than bullshit opinion.
Agreed.
'social sciences' are no moar than commie indoctrination.
>sorry. you're talking to a scientist/engineer.
Imagine inspecting a batch of steel.
It's a great batch of steel.
One of the best you've ever seen.
Now imagine grading it on a bell curve, and giving chinesium ratings to most of the batch because bell curve is moar important than properties.
Anon understands your original rant.
Just pointing out it goes other way, too.