>>15931088 pb

>WELL….. HERE WE FUCKING GO

Anon, I am not sure what to say other than to recall Q's advice that we have more than we know.

I suggest that anyone interested in whether Comey is possibly a white hat (and maybe Q) would likely find it worthwhile to go back and read this series from the start.

If anyone has objections to my actual reasoning, or seeks to clarify what my reasoning actually is, I would be glad to consider such replies.

This is the most recent installment of a decode/dig on DOJ related topics that has mostly ended up (so far) focusing on Comey.

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/115742.html#115813 1: Opener, Analysis of Pence and Flynn

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116081.html#116087 2: More Pence and Flynn with Q-style "decode" graphics (featuring Ben Hur)

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116971.html#117057 3: Comey as possible white hat, Analysis of initial HRC "exoneration"

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118116.html#118140 4: Comey's role in the 2020 election

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118597.html#118638 5: Some topics from Comey's books

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/119330.html#119352 6: Comey as Q (?), BIG decode graphic with Battle of Midway, "Ramsey Rapist" and more

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/120083.html#120196 7: Small decode graphic re possible Comey tweet reply to prior post

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/121286.html#121494 8: Comey Jan 11 tweet decode

>>15931065 PB: 9: More complex decodes integrating Comey and multiple topics from recent and distant history

I have three new graphics to post, and they all involve "known" insiders and "possible" insiders possibly responding to what I posted in the prior segment (Part 9).

These include Dan Scavino and Devin Nunes (and some more "questionable" comm sources that I think "just work").

I had some stuff in the works from Kash Patel but nothing panned out so far and I will keep at that.

I also have many angles lined up for further study and welcome suggestions and replies.

>>16001851

This graphic is fairly simply.

The one thing that perhap needs stating overtly is that I have switched my background color here on purpose.

My prior "decode" graphics were in brown, but now all of my current graphics are including little chunks of those graphics.

To avoid an "unreadable" graphic with color overlap, I have switched the current background color.

The upshot is that when you see a brown "junk border", I have intentionally included that to signify that I am showing a portion of a prior graphic from Part 9.

I should also say that inasmuch as my prior installment was really getting out of control, I have veered more towards a "stream of consciousness" style here.

Maybe I am not getting everthing exactly right, but at least you can see what I am thinking.

I am probably liable to make more errors though, and apologize in advance.

I am finding so many interesting things that I figure it is best to get the ideas out there.

>>16001858

The comments in the prior post apply here as well.

This graphic features recent comms from Devin Nunes, in apparent response to my prior graphics.

The two relvevant graphics can be found in Part 9 of the full series (see above).

>>16001864

Again, my prior comments apply.

This graphic is more of an interconnected whole, and I grant that many will simply find it unbelievable.

But I think that everything I say checks out.

I am not shooting for 100% perfection but I am very carefully checking and rechecking and trying to examine whether I might be saying things that are ludicrous, and it is my considered opinion that I am not.