>>16020475 (pb)

>Back to my question, what is it about the powers and authority of a special council that makes Durham untouchable? Looking for legal clarification

For a sitting President to fire a special council was once considered by a bipartisan Congress to be automatic grounds for Impeachment. That obviously isn't a concern here so why exactly isn't Biden moving to fire him? No worry about a Constitutional crisis as the SCOTUS is compd. (Actually, it is null and void as a result of Devolution).

>>16020938

The short answer is that "firing Durham" is not in the resident's script and we know that resident won't deviate from his script for fear of the consequences.

>>16020934

OY VEY! THE GOYIM KNOW!!!

>>16020976

Exactly. So why isn't Garland firing Durham? Who's going to say boo? No one. Logically (apart what anons know for fact), only Devolution makes sense here.

>>16021001

It would certainly make sense out of every scene of the resident, and the fake news corps, acting out of a fake White House.

>>16021025

Future elections? Or all elections, past and future?