Now that they have revealed what China is doing to their citizens, guaranteed some Tyrant in Canada or EU will try this
As seen on Weibo: Shanghai residents go to their balconies to sing & protest lack of supplies.A drone appears: “Please comply w covid restrictions. Control your soul’s desire for freedom. Do not open the window or sing.” https://m.weibo.cn/status/4755028135383701
https://twitter.com/MiriamElder/status/1511690606539685895?s=20&t=4eB8VlshdU1EbuWA74Zx9A
6 Ways Elon Musk Could Actually Improve Twitter
By: Rachel Bovard
April 06, 2022
We shouldn’t have to beg oligarchs to make billion-dollar purchases of major companies to access the public square, but while we have him there, here are some suggestions.
Let Trump Back on Twitter
Stop Shadowbanning and Deplatforming ‘Misinformation’
Move Twitter’s Offices Out of Silicon Valley
Enforce the First Amendment
Give Users Power Over Their Own Content
Give a Blue Checkmark to Anyone Who Verifies His Identity
Elon Musk May Save Twitter, but He Won’t Solve Big Tech
As refreshing as it is to see Silicon Valley face an honest-to-goodness free speech challenge, it bears repeating: the fact that it’s taken a billionaire (with deep commercial ties to China) buying a board seat on Twitter to even possibly move the needle is a troubling statement about who controls our public discourse and how it is done.
The Big Tech companies increasingly control not only the flow of information but access to the digital marketplace as well. Musk may force Twitter to bend the knee – and that would be a welcome development.
At the very least, as “Breaking Points” co-host Saagar Enjeti recently pointed out, it will either improve the platform or provide a useful data point about the limits of shareholder advocacy.
Regardless of what happens at Twitter, the power and market concentration of companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, and Amazon continue to grow unchecked. And quixotic billionaires are in short supply. Without meaningful congressional action on everything from antitrust to data privacy to Sec. 230, the public square will still remain stifled.
Another very long and good article
https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/06/6-ways-elon-musk-could-actually-improve-twitter/
Mollie@MZHemingway
Really interesting thread here
All of this provesdemocrats never cared aboutblack people, women, trans, gay, hispanics, poverty, kids from south america etc. etc. etc, once all people wake up to the fact they are grifters, tyrants, black mail artists and any possible felonious label that be applied, and the ultimate users, the world will be a better place because no one will vote for the evil that they are anymore, take them out of power now. Persecuting a Supreme Court Justice is beyond the pale of the darkness, almost worse than hell.
@MarkPaoletta
To be clear, 28 U.S.C. 455 ("Disqualification of justice, judge") APPLIES to Supreme Court Justices. "(a)Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."
@scottwongDC
Quote Tweet
Scott Wong@scottwongDC· 20h
NEW: House Judiciary Dems plan to hold a private meeting soon to discuss how they might further respond to conflict-of-interest accusations against Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, conservative activist Ginni Thomas https://nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-democrats-are-weighing-stronger-response-justice-thomas-conflict-rcna23116
Show this thread
8:51 PM · Apr 5, 2022·Twitter Web App
In 1993, 7 Supreme Court Justices issued a Statement of Recusal Policy APPLYING 28 U.S.C. 455. " We have spouses, children or other relatives within the degree of relationship covered by 28 U.S.C. §455 who are or may become practicing attorneys." http://eppc.org/docLib/2011010
If House Judiciary Dems take up issue with new recusal standard applied to Thomases, I hope they discuss RBG voting on cases in which her husband's law firm appeared before Court. She even voted in favor of Marty's law colleagues' client. Conflict?
@JudiciaryGOP
@HouseJudiciary
Or RBG voting on cases in which Marty's client (Ross Perot's EDS) repeatedly appeared before Court and she did not recuse. Perot even endowed a chair in Marty's name at Georgetown Law! Still no recusal from RBG. https://newsweek.com/baseless-recusal-attack-clarence-thomas-opinion-1686780
@scottwongDC
Or how RBG sat on Bd of Directors for pro-abortion NOW Legal Defense Fund in 1970s, and never once recused from case in which NOW Legal Defense Fund appeared. She even autographed one of her opinions and donated it to NOW for a FUNDRAISER! Impartial??
Or spoke at NOW LDF lecture named after RBG (!) and had already 2 weeks earlier voted exactly how NOW LDF had advocated in its brief. Or voted the same way her daughter had advocated in an article written about a pending copyright case.
@HouseJudiciary
@JudiciaryGOP
@scottwongDC
The Baseless 'Recusal' Attack on Clarence Thomas | Opinion
Mark Paoletta
On 3/11/22 at 6:30 AM EST
https://www.newsweek.com/baseless-recusal-attack-clarence-thomas-opinion-1686780
Dr. Margot Cleveland is pretty funny! I thought DS stood for Deep State, but I guess it was a friend. kek
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1511759935264239622?s=20&t=4eB8VlshdU1EbuWA74Zx9A
Anons you've got to watch the Trailer "Rigged", it's going to be the best film ever
Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump
Watch The Trailer below
https://citizensunitedmovies.com/pages/rigged
The movie is coming out in April 2022, I'm excited, it's powerful, but on the other hand it won't convince those who hate us, it will be the ones questioning all their choices now.
well zuck is a pedo or a robot, he just cares about power and manipulating the world. I swear he lost his soul somewhere early (if he ever had one) because he looked like a human when he first started. Did they kill the human and replace it with a machine? Seems so!
Why did DARPA choose him of all people?
Exclusive —Trump at ‘Rigged’ Premiere: ‘It Shouldn’t Be Allowed’ for Mark Zuckerberg to Privately Finance Election Operations
Matthew Boyle6 Apr 2022Palm Beach,
PALM BEACH, Florida — Former President Donald Trump told Breitbart News exclusively that states and the federal government should ban private financing of election operations, and make it illegal for people like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into election offices.
President Trump is interviewed by Breitbart News’s Matt Boyle at screening of Rigged in Mar-a-Lago. (Courtesy Citizens United)
Trump’s comments came during an exclusive interview here at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Tuesday evening when Citizens United president David Bossie premiered his group’s new documentary film Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump. The film analyzes the approximately $400 million that Zuckerberg funneled to local election offices in predominantly Democrat areas in swing states nationwide. The film demonstrates that former President Barack Obama’s former campaign manager David Plouffe—among many other hard-left Democrat operatives—oversaw the distribution and spending of the money, and that while some Trump counties and precincts got some grants, the overwhelmingly vast majority of the cash flowed into inner cities that boosted Democrat turnout.
“Every American needs to see Rigged in order to take away the education that this film provides so that every American understands how Donald Trump didn’t lose the electionbut how it was for months beforehand set up for him to not be able to win,” Bossie told Breitbart News at the premiere. “He says it was stolen or rigged—it is. That’s what Mark Zuckerberg did. Mark Zuckerberg spent $400 million to put his thumb on the scale to make sure that Joe Biden won the election.”
A stunning 92 percent of the Zuckerberg cash in 160 different large grants totaling over $400,000 per grant—$270 million of the money in total—went to areas that now-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, won. The film explores, too, the justification for the issuance of the grants, which was supposedly to have “safe” elections as the coronavirus pandemic raged in the United States—even though no medical experts were ever employed by the array of nonprofits that Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan used to pump the money out.
“This is somebody that put up $417 million,” Trump told Breitbart News. “Nobody has ever heard of a thing like that. Yet if you go more than $5,600 they put you in jail. So nobody has ever heard of a thing like this where they put in $417 million. Think about it—if you go $100 more than the $5,600 they do very bad things to you. It’s a disgrace and they shouldn’t be allowed to. If they get away with this, it will be a true disgrace to America. This, again, what this movie is about—it’s really a beautiful movie, I’ve seen just a part of it and I’m looking forward to seeing the whole thing—but it’s really something that reveals what went on in one aspect of the theft. One aspect—there were many aspects of it. You have seen the numbers and you saw the kind of enthusiasm we had. You see a lot of the votes we had. Every day, look at what’s going on in Wisconsin, look at what’s going on in Pennsylvania, look at what’s going on in Arizona. It’s disgraceful what happened. But it happened.”
“Citizens United, they’re a very strong and very smart group of people,” Trump told Breitbart News. “Dave Bossie has done a wonderful job, and all of the board. What they’ve done is revealed one of the many ways they rigged the election. This was a rigged election. Now even the New York Times came out and said they didn’t report the Hunter Biden story because of the fact that if they had done so before–let’s face it–it would have amounted to 17 points in the polling. Those are just two of many other ways. There’s so many ways this happened and it’s a disgrace. Between the rigged elections and the open borders and all the other things happening to this country, including inflation, it’s just a disaster.”
Trump also called on Republicans to “get a lot tougher.”
“They’re going to have to get a lot tougher,” Trump said. “The Republicans are going to have to get a lot tougher. The vote counters were a disaster. There’s an expression that the vote counters are more important than the candidate and you could use that expression here. What took place during this election is sinful.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/04/06/exclusive-trump-rigged-premiere-shouldnt-be-allowed-mark-zuckerberg-privately-finance-election-operations/
These people are liars, they always lie, they know it can't be done now, and it will take a long time, or free energy to be released. They are sick assholes, I'd like to see them give up riding in a car and walk everywhere for a week, and see if they say these dishonest snarky propaganda statement again.
Plus the push for this is for their investments in green energy, that they been pushing for 15 years.
why did they kill the fox, he was doing the world a favor cleaning up the vermin in DC? And why mention it, so the scardy cat politicians can come out of hiding?
Glenn's sense of humor is great, oh the irony of all the whiners now!
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1511475727161565189?s=20&t=gdbGSbMDpxKN4YMmGvcPhw
https://twitter.com/GregLeopold/status/1511476111846383618?s=20&t=gdbGSbMDpxKN4YMmGvcPhw
True but sad!
https://twitter.com/ThomasSowell/status/1511713595335262208?s=20&t=gdbGSbMDpxKN4YMmGvcPhw
Message to Autistsand to all intelligent non cowed people.
https://twitter.com/sashachapin/status/1511493312783421444?s=20&t=gdbGSbMDpxKN4YMmGvcPhw
Federal Judge Finds J6 Defendant Not Guilty, Nuking DOJ Charges That Walking Through An Open Door Is A Crime
By: Jordan Boyd April 06, 2022
A federal judge found a Jan. 6 defendant who entered the Capitol not guilty on all charges after he said he was waved in by two Capitol Police officers. The decision lays down the groundwork to push back against the Department of Justice’s charge that the hundreds of people on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021 deserve to be punished.
U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden acquitted Matthew Martin of all misdemeanor charges on Wednesday after he said it was “plausible” that the defendant “reasonably believed” he had permission to be in the Capitol.
Martin made the trek to Washington D.C. after he saw a tweet from former President Donald Trump in December 2020 encouraging supporters to come to his rally. Martin said he entered the Capitol when he was “let in” by two U.S. Capitol Police officers who waved him through a doorway. In his testimony, Martin said law enforcement officers did not try to stop him from entering the building.
McFadden established that Martin’s involvement in the event in the Capitol was “minimal and not serious.” He also said that video evidence shows that “quiet” and “orderly” Martin was merely a “silent observer” instead of an active participant who entertained any of the crowd’s rowdy antics.
When the Sante Fe, N.M., man was arrested a year ago in April of 2021, he faced a myriad of charges including “entering and remaining in a restricted building; disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building; violent entry and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.”
As a result, Martin lost his job as a senior engineer at a company that does work for the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. Now that he was found not guilty on all counts, Martin hopes he can get his job back.
“I am very thankful for the judge’s verdict and I’m hoping that I can my life back, I can get my job back,” he said in an interview after the judge’s ruling.
“Martin did not break the law,” the defendant’s lawyer stated. “And we had the benefit of a lot of video evidence, and the judge had a chance to see it. And video evidence is the best evidence, and he did nothing wrong.”
The acquittal comes hours after reports that President Joe Biden’s DOJ requested extra funds from Congress to prosecute Americans who were present on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6. WTF
https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/06/federal-judge-finds-j6-defendant-not-guilty-nuking-doj-charges-that-walking-through-an-open-door-is-a-crime/
yes I know, I didn't think it relevant to the board because, well you know! kek