TYB
How much of social media do anons think is truly organic?
for example, twitterfag anon notices that only a few "major" accounts seem to be somewhat organic while ~90% of twitter is bots or seemingly AI-controlled accounts, ect. Similar with reddit.
If you haven't seen r/SubSimulatorGPT2 or r/SubSimulatorGPT3 (different language engines) , its a very interesting experiment. all posts are made by bots and they interact with each other.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SubSimulator_GPT3/
Now image that but on a grand scale, with far better technology and algorithms. how influential would it be? how much power to shape minds and opinions?
Essentially, the "Dead Internet Theory", but more limited to social media.
https://futurism.com/the-byte/conspiracy-theory-internet-died
Remember all those ip addresses that the military rounded up?
Could it be?
it would be the biggest psychological operation of all time.
would appreciate anon's thoughts.
>f We the People do not control our communication network(s), then those networks control us; they are what they were engineered to be, a consumer mind control apparatus.
see
>given freedom to gain additional following
only if it fits the narrative.
yes, there are big names on the right, but really only for the appearance of some 'balance'.
If your twitter account hasn't been banned outright, you are probably just shadowbanned and the algos just show you bots all day.
>The probability of US mil having this capacity and not using it is 0.
agree 100%
imagine the power of that operation. damn near the perfect weapon.
> How to even know for sure that emails, DM's, and forum posts are accurately passing along what we type, or that everyone is seeing the same thing?
So much is fake.
How convenient that the whole world went to zoom due to COVID for two years, where everything could be collected and the data used to produce fakes as well.
Anon remembers even having a job interview that was by an AI. Noped out of that one real quick.
The weirdest things man.