>>16083333 (pb)

>Gaining Redemption does not mean there are no consequences for this mortal coil.

Incorrect. Many have lived before us, and have controlled and dominated the multiples of generations of people before us with impunity. As a matter of fact, those that have been subjugated the most have paid the most dearly so that those that elevate themselves above the masses could enjoy leisure, pleasure, pillage, and reward.

>Each one redeemed can only live in the present to change the future.

Agree; each person that realizes the true nature of this world can only live in the present to change their future, and work towards a better world for all. If you haven't realized the irony of calling out the shills that pretend to be Christfags for constantly working to bring others down due to their past, then perhaps you haven't paid attention to this being, quite literally, the first time in human history where the subjugating "elite" supposedly aren't getting away with it. And perhaps the allegory of the plan is lost on you.

>>16083353 (lb)

These are not "values" or "culture" issues. These are intelligence issues. Other than that, everything on this list is an IQ issue.

One exception; pornography should NOT be as accessible as it is. Now debate. Is this pic pornographic?

>>16084159

Everyone that's a big name is an asset of one type of another. KDC rides coattails. That's what he does.

>>16084248

>>16084248

Speaking of liars, didn't KDC say that Tucker was in/near Switzerland getting the good on the laptop? Because I'm watching Tucker, right now, and he's in LA talking about cow mutilations.

>>16084246

Who decides what's a realistic depiction of the human form that doesn't traverse into the indecent? If, by your definition, nipples and labia make it pornographic, then what makes penises OK to display in public? Because that's pretty graphic to be displaying an actual depiction of a phallus on a statue while figurative phallus are all over the fucking place.