Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 10:55 a.m. No.16106946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6955 >>6972 >>6993

Accused Bully JournalistTaylor Lorenz Breaks Down In Tears Claiming To Have PTSD Over Mean Tweets

46,009 views

Apr 2, 2022

5.3K

Dislike

Share

Save

Black Conservative Perspective

366K subscribers

⭐ Wooden American Star:

https://bridgethegapshop.com/discount…

👕Merch: https://gforemanbcp.com/

🤙🏾 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/blackconserva…

👊Paypal: https://paypal.me/GregoryForeman?loca…

💸Cash App: $gforemanbcp

🏃‍♂️Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/gforemanBCP @gforemanBCP

📷 Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gforemanbcp/

💼 My Start Up: https://oshyhome.com

 

Taylor Lorenz said she has suffered "severe PTSD" from being "a journalist" and broke down in an MSNBC interview on Friday.

 

https://thepostmillennial.com/so-call…

 

Legal Disclosure: I’m not a financial advisor. The information contained in this video is for entertainment purposes only. Before investing, please consult a licensed professional. Any stock purchases I show on video should not be considered “investment recommendations”. I shall not be held liable for any losses you may incur for investing and trading in the stock market in an attempt to mirror what I do. Investments may decline in value and/or disappear entirely. Please be careful!

1,780 Comments

Default profile photo

Add a comment…

C x

C x

2 weeks ago

she's crying about "the worst people on the internet" and she doesn't realize she IS ONE OF THEM

975

Bulwark AC

Bulwark AC

2 weeks ago

They always believe they are justified. The mental gymnastics made would be amazing to choreograph.

47

Pierre Goku

Pierre Goku

2 weeks ago

That's exactly what i thought.

 

 

all pb

>>16106329, >>16106540 Who is Taylor Lorenz? (taylorlorenz.com)

>>16106663 Time line of Events Taylor Lorenz: #crybully

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 11:04 a.m. No.16106993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7020 >>7025

>>16106946

>>16106955

Uses her job writing for fake news to take down her own business rivals

 

Had a financial partnership with United Talent Agency as she wrote hit piece on Influence agent Ariadna Jacob

 

#FoxNews #TuckerCarlsonTonight

Talent agent exposes New York Times reporter Taylor Lorenz

537,415 views

Oct 1, 2021

15K

Dislike

Share

Save

Fox News

9.36M subscribers

Entrepreneur Ariadna Jacob shares how she lost her business due to New York Times staffer Taylor Lorenz's dishonest reporting. #FoxNews #TuckerCarlsonTonight

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 11:09 a.m. No.16107020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7024 >>7037

>>16106993

she really should've done moar than just contemplate

 

https://ariadnajacob.medium.com/tampering-by-nyt-taylor-lorenz-exposes-conflict-of-interest-damages-startup-fc28957f0347

May 11, 2021

Tampering by NYT Taylor Lorenz Exposes Conflict of Interest, Damages Ariadna Jacob’s Startup

 

Taylor Lorenz abused her position as technology reporter for the New York Times by tampering with the relationships in an industry she covers. A direct and intentional result of this tampering has been the damage to the credibility of Ariadna Jacob, CEO of Influences, a leading digital marketing and influencer firm that formerly represented many of the highest-earning TikTok stars in the world. Jacob claims that she has been blacklisted from an industry in which she was previously cited as a leader due to the inaccuracies in Lorenz’ stories and Twitter posts, and due to her major and direct conflict of interest with Influences competitors. United Talent Agency is the behemoth Hollywood talent agency that represents Lorenz. Many former Influences clients are now represented by UTA.

 

Among the Standards and Ethics documents on the Times Company website is a manual titled Ethical Journalism Guidebook, stated to be “a handbook of values and practices for the News and Opinion departments.” It contains many strictures that Lorenz violated in her coverage of Influences, UTA and the TikTok influencer industry. The Guidebook explicitly says, “Staff members may not accept employment or compensation of any sort from individuals or organizations who figure or are likely to figure in coverage they provide, edit, package or supervise.” UTA represents Lorenz for book deals.

 

UTA sought to increase its presence in the TikTok influencer industry, a sector of the digital media that traditional talent agencies had been slow to penetrate. Lorenz published the first of two articles concerning UTA, Influences and Jacob on April 6, 2020, These Top Hollywood Agents Are Signing All The Influencers. In it, she mentions other agencies briefly, but features quotes from or information about three UTA executives. The article closes with quotes from a UTA client declaring the agency to be the most relevant in the industry. At no time does Lorenz disclose her relationship with UTA. The effect of the article is a recommendation of an agency to a talent, which also violates the Ethical Journalism Guidebook section Rules for Specialized Departments which reads, “(employees) may not suggest agents, publishers, producers or galleries to aspiring authors, playwrights, composers or artists.”

 

The second article, Trying to Make It Big Online? Getting Signed Isn’t Everything, appeared on August 14, 2020. It paints a one-sided story of the events surrounding the establishment, management and ultimate failure of the Kids Next Door and Girls in the Valley content creator houses. It also details a complaint to the California Labor Commission in which Jacob was accused of withholding payment from a client. The article makes numerous defamatory claims against Jacob and her company with spurious or no substantiation. Many of the claims Lorenz reported included statements that Jacob and her lawyer had previously refuted in emails to Lorenz. Former Influences clients are quoted with no context or corroboration — clients who had breached their contracts with Jacob and were now signed to or being pursued by UTA.

 

Lorenz reported that the influencers living in the Kids Next Door house “were told that they would have to cover a larger share of rent.” Jacob’s lawyer responded to this allegation prior to the article being published, and called it “100% false.” Lorenz ignored this, along with Jacob’s lawyer’s thorough explanation of the agreements between Jacob and her clients, which indicated that Jacob was being taken advantage of by clients and others attempting to live rent-free in the house.

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 11:11 a.m. No.16107037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7064

>>16107020

>she really should've done moar than just contemplate

 

Several of the tenants admitted to Jacob and her lawyer that they had taken side deals with brands that cut Influences out of contractually obligated commissions, and that they were refusing to pay their agreed upon share of the rent in an attempt to force breaches of their contracts. One tenant, Jessie Underhill, said that another tenant, Marcus Olin, encouraged him to speak negatively about Jacob to Lorenz in order to avoid paying rent and commissions, indicating that if they were able to damage Influences enough, that the company would not have the resources to litigate the breaches of contract. Following the publication of the August article, Underhill approached Jacob and a colleague and told them that he had lied to Lorenz because she had been aggressively pursuing him to provide dirt on Jacob and Influences. At this time, Jacob says Underhill wanted to move back into the Kids Next Door house and resume his relationship with Influences. Jacob added that just prior to Olin speaking to Lorenz, Olin threatened her with “severe consequences” if she did not agree to cancel Olin’s production contract with Influences, in which Jacob had already invested tens of thousands of dollars.

 

Throughout the article, Lorenz includes selected responses from Jacob and her lawyer. The responses are incomplete and culled from several emails between both camps. Omitted are any of the responses or documentation that would elaborate on the relationships and agreements between Influences and its clients, as well as any information that would exonerate Jacob. Lorenz oversimplifies the situation greatly, and lends full credence to unsubstantiated claims without including Jacob’s rebuttals. This is especially evident in the description of the legal dispute between Jacob and Brittany Tomlinson, who, at various times, had signed with Influences, UTA and Creator Edge, a third management entity comprised of Jacob, Jace Norman and Benjamin Berkley.

 

Jacob maintained that Influences never withheld any money owed to Tomlinson, and shared accounting records showing that Tomlinson was paid on time, within 5 days of Influences receiving payment from the brands using her for campaigns. Lorenz omits this information while quoting Tomlinson liberally. Tomlinson’s complaint with the California Labor Commission was based primarily on claims that Jacob was guilty of operating a talent agency without a license and demanding an “unconscionable” commission of 20%. Lorenz failed to acknowledge that online content creators are usually not considered “artists’’ under the California Labor Code unless they also work in one of the more traditional entertainment arenas, such as film, television or stage or that top TikTok representation firms including TalentX, Willy Social, Collab, Doiyen and Viral Nation often collect 20% commissions from creators. Even if Tomlinson had been considered an artist under the California Talent Agency Act, she had signed with UTA in November of 2019, and UTA was working in conjunction with Creator Edge. The case was far more complex than Lorenz accounted for, and by quoting Tomlinson without Jacob’s rebuttals she painted a very negative picture of Influences and Jacob while giving Tomlinson’s claims full credence. The complaint was ultimately resolved, and Influences was not required to present its defense to the Labor Commissioner, but by that time, the damage had been done. Lorenz has so far failed to publish another story explaining the outcome of the case.

 

Incomplete or tangential responses from Jacob tepidly follow uncorroborated statements by Drip Crib influencer Devion Young, Tomlinson and others. Lorenz was provided with documentation that elaborated on all situations, but shared the former Influences clients accusations without qualification.

 

Young claimed that Jacob was responsible for distributing nude photos that Lorenz says she has documentation of but refuses to provide. Lorenz does mention that Jacob’s lawyers dispute the claim, but gives none of the supporting context that the lawyer provided to her prior to the article being published, which indicated that Jacob simply made her partners aware of the existence of the photos.

 

Young said that Jacob leaked his nude photos to mutual business partners. Jacob says this is categorically false. Young and Jacob do not have — and have never had — any mutual business partners. Jacob says that she received a text alerting her to an allegation about Young sending nudes to potentially inappropriate parties. Jacob immediately forwarded those screenshots to the house manager for Drip Crib so he could investigate and as a matter of pressing ethical concern. She also sent them to Young who stated to Jacob at the time that his nude photos had been leaked on thousands of online Telegram chat groups by a member of the Drip Crib.

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 11:16 a.m. No.16107064   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7119

>>16107037

Likewise, the responses concerning Tomlinson’s claims about her “lock(ing) creators into contracts” includes out of context quotes from two management professionals without any evidence that they are even discussing Jacob. It is evident that Young and Tomlinson expected to benefit from their statements being taken at face value.

 

Lorenz includes quotes from several individuals who misrepresent their connection to Influences. Lorenz presents Tianna Singer as an Influences client and cites her as the primary source for her description of the events surrounding the dissolution of the Girls in the Valley house, a description that is disparaging of and misleading about Jacob’s role in the enterprise. Witnesses who could have corroborated Jacob’s version of events were ignored. Jacob states that Singer was never signed to anything other than a standard liability waiver as a guest at a content house and that Singer was never an official Influences client signed to a management or production contract. Jacob says that she tried to steer opportunities to Singer, but that Singer declined the opportunities around the time that Singer was being interviewed for the article. Lorenz instead relates Singer’s accusation that “She promised brand deals, money and opportunities. Everyone was promised income, but that never happened.”

 

During the time Lorenz was insinuating herself into the lives of the impressionable young creators and their often equally impressionable parents as she worked on the articles, UTA was actively pursuing Influences clients.

 

Lorenz has gone on to sow discord in other areas of the technology sector and is receiving strong backlash from many media commentators and critics for a number of recent gaffes. She has been caught masquerading online using a fake name and profile, something else that is explicitly against the Ethical Journalism Guidebook. She is held up as an example of reckless journalism by many, such as Glenn Greenwald, Tucker Carlson and Saagar Enjeti. In the case of her coverage of the TikTok influencer industry, her recklessness willfully exacerbated an already tenuous situation. Her slanted reporting cost several people more than hundreds of thousands of dollars while benefiting the agency that represented her. Influences is effectively out of business as the company it once was, and Jacob is picking up the pieces of her shattered career as she seeks investment funding for a new technology startup. In light of Lorenz’ failure to report on the outcome of Tomlinson’s complaint to the California Labor Commission, it is reasonable to conclude that her biased depictions of the industry demonstrate an ulterior motive, namely, to damage the credibility of Jacob for the benefit of UTA.

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 11:44 a.m. No.16107212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7361

>>16107119

>I wrote like this DEFENSE OF FURRIES

>>16107131

>I wrote like this DEFENSE OF FURRIES

So She's just Talking aboutDefending Furrieswith a formerHussein staffer

 

And hes's like…yeaahhh

 

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/keeping-1600-podcasts-obama-alums-launch-new-show-crooked-media-company-961556/

 

‘Keeping It 1600’ Podcast’s Obama Alums Launch New Show and ‘Crooked Media’ Company

 

Exiting Bill Simmons' Ringer network, 'Pod Save America' debuts Monday — with editorial platform Crooked Media coming later in 2017.

January 9, 2017 12:00am

 

The team behind popular politics podcast Keeping It 1600 is doubling down in 2017. With less than two weeks to go before Donald Trump is sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, Jon Favreau,Jon Lovett and Tommy Vietor are launching a new media company with an eye on progressive advocacy that touts a tongue-in-cheek name: Crooked Media.

 

“If Hillary [Clinton] had won, I think we would have kept doing the podcast as a part-time job,” says Favreau, a former speechwriter for President Obama who has been running a Los Angeles-based consulting firm with Vietor. “When Trump won, we felt the other jobs we had were no longer sufficient. We needed to get back in the game. There’s a lot at stake right now and, certainly with Trump in office, there’s a lot in danger.”

 

Their big play, however, means the demise of Keeping It 1600. The podcast, which debuted on Bill Simmons’ Ringer network last May and quickly climbed the iTunes charts, released its final episode at the end of the year. Filling its place will be Pod Save America, a nearly identical program that premieres today and will air new episodes twice weekly under the Crooked Media banner. “We talked to Bill about this and he’s been supportive the whole time, but I think the idea of having an activism-focused organization under the rubric of a media company that does sports and entertainment coverage doesn’t work,” Favreau adds. “It seems to us that the best way to grow this is to do it on our own.”

 

They are essentially on their own, initially relying only on ad revenue for the new podcast. Crooked Media — the name is a play on Trump’s derogatory nickname for Clinton and, at times, the news media itself — ultimately plans to be a hub for video, editorial content and information about liberal forces working against Trump’s conservative platform. Favreau says all that will come later, as the immediate focus is on rebuilding its strong subscriber base on the new podcast. Favreau, Lovett and Vietor will continue to host the Monday episode of Pod Save America, as they did on 1600, while Thursday episodes will again find Favreau joined by Dan Pfeiffer. (Pfeiffer, who served as a CNN contributor during the election, will not be part of Crooked Media, instead keeping his post as communications and policy vp at GoFundMe.)

 

Keeping It 1600 became an incredibly popular outlet for commentary during the presidential election. The four hosts, former advisers to Obama and staffers for much of his presidency, come with an admittedly liberal point of view — but frequently welcomed guests from both side of the aisle. The plan is to keep that up in this new iteration, while also drawing on voices from the world of entertainment in the effort to keep things light.

 

Favreau and Lovett, both of whom now live in Los Angeles (Lovett, 34, created the short-lived NBC comedy 1600 Penn), say they want Pod Save America and future Crooked Media content to blend the accessible political humor of TV hosts like John Oliver and Samantha Bee with their own firsthand familiarity with politics after years spent working in the beltway.

 

“There’s an entire generation that traditional political media is not reaching,” says Favreau. “A lot of what you hear on television is in a dead language. It’s similar a problem to the communication we get from politicians a lot.”

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 12:07 p.m. No.16107361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7522

>>16107212

>Furries

she's so fucking queer

 

<my beat

 

<my beat

<my beat

<my beat

>your beat

 

<my beat

<the crux of my beat

 

my biggest frustration is people think I write about teenagers,

which I do

a lot

Anonymous ID: 6b3bfb April 19, 2022, 12:38 p.m. No.16107522   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16107361

>my biggest frustration is people think I write about teenagers,

 

>which I do

 

>a lot

WORK | DIGIDAY 6059 DIGIDAYI want them to know I'm not some reporter up in an ivory tower.“On the challenges of covering internet culture… . “The biggest, most challenging thing about my job is getting teenagers to talk to me on the phone and getting them to let you into their house and follow them around. To have a photographer come is overwhelming; a lot of kids don’t want anything to do with it, especially if their parents aren’t fully aware of what they are doing. I really do not call myself a teen reporter, mostly because most of the stuff that I write about has nothing to do with teenagers. I've been writing about this stuff for a long time and only in the past two years did people associate my beat with teenagers. Before my beat was always associated with millennials.”

 

https://digiday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/digiday_issue17_03010_digital.pdf