> if they win control of one or both houses of Congress
That's a might suspicious 'if' there, speaks volumes, for example, are they suggesting there is nothing to look at unless they gain the majority?
> if they win control of one or both houses of Congress
That's a might suspicious 'if' there, speaks volumes, for example, are they suggesting there is nothing to look at unless they gain the majority?
>Term limits are needed, though. Not age limits.
Agreed, the benefits are then that new and better ideas are rewarded; 'retired' geriatrics get to enjoy the benefits of 'new and better ideas'.
"By the end of the 115th Congress, 73 percent of representatives will have served three or more terms.
318 representatives—more than two-thirds of the House—will have served three or more terms at the end of this Congress, and thus would be out of a job if the suggested term limits were in place. Of the 318 legislators, 161 are Republicans and 157 are Democrats."
https://www.quorum.us/data-driven-insights/term-limits-in-congress/