dChan
Anonymous ID: 333a04 April 25, 2022, 9:33 a.m. No.16150611   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0644 >>0682 >>1024 >>1233 >>1249

New document from court by Margot Cleveland

 

Limine, granting in part, denying in part. 1/

2/Most left for trial:

3/ I think the court is misunderstanding the concession here. There is a difference between saying I'm not doing to show there is a link, and saying we agree there is no link or agreeing we won't imply there actually was a link, but we'll see how Durham handles this.

4/ I think Durham was making a more nuanced argument than the court got. That there is a difference between saying the data was falsified (i.e. challenging the accuracy of the data) and saying the data does not show a link.

5/ Durham allowed to put on evidence of FBI's conclusions and steps.

6/ Alfa Bank and other represents cannot testified though:

7/ Nor can CIA testify "extensively" about it's same investigation.

8/ Court then gives Sussmann a heads up on what might open the door. The court's ruling here is very "hedgey" i.e., "length and complex"

9/ DOJ's expert can testify on three specific rulings.

10/ But can't testify about accuracy of data unless Sussmann opens door.

11/Overall a victory for Durham, with Sussmann not getting anything of value excluded, and at trial much may end up in based on what Sussmann does.

12/ I do think there is one disconnect between the court and the parties though: I think Sussmann wants to argue there could have been a secret communications channel between Alfa Bank & Trump. I don't have the transcript (if anyone has posted, please let me know), but I think

13/ Sussmann's team said basically, weren't not conceding there was no channel and that they implied they would suggest that there is still possibility that a channel existed. And that is why Durham wants to show no, there is no channel.

12:02 PM · Apr 25, 2022·Twitter Web App

 

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1518614174494085122?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs

Anonymous ID: 333a04 April 25, 2022, 9:43 a.m. No.16150682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16150611

The one problem with only letting the FBI explain the ALPHA bank hoax and not the CIA, is that FBI didn't conclusively say the Yotaphone thing was a fraud, and the CIA conclusively said it was a fraud and looked to be "user created", so CIA's testimony would be a lot more convincing. But perhaps the CIA didn't want an agent to testify.

 

Kash said it was a disgrace why the FBI wouldn't conclusively say it was a hoax, because the FBI relied on that for the FISA submissions

Anonymous ID: 333a04 April 25, 2022, 9:45 a.m. No.16150702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0729 >>0748 >>1024 >>1046 >>1233 >>1249

blue checkmarks still freakin about Musk getting twitter, "he'll destroy what they built" (free speech censoring programs)Kekkity

 

Margot's response is perfect

 

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1518627584350859264?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs

Anonymous ID: 333a04 April 25, 2022, 9:53 a.m. No.16150729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0739

>>16150702

she's right they will try, that's whyevery single employee and contractor at twitter needs a psych evaluationand sign a document that under penalty of going to jail, they won't fuck around with free speech

 

What's so obvious, if Musk had to buy twitter to liberate free speech, it means our government and every politician is totally incapable of defending our constitutional rights, they are all bought off and lobbied. No one at this point in congress or senate had loyalty to the Constitution to uphold our rights on free speech.

 

You know how they shout they will defend 2A, don't count on that either.

 

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1518632241584295938?s=20&t=gYB78yAx9sKbGxkBWXXUOWyrquqXrFF3rjifeRTvzjs

Anonymous ID: 333a04 April 25, 2022, 10:03 a.m. No.16150790   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16150586

doubtful, I think the purchase of twitter was to get the technology and combine both of them, Truth Social will still be part of it, maybe a section for researchers. Or they'll be separate for people that don't want to be tracked, etc.