Anonymous ID: 645155 April 27, 2022, 7:43 p.m. No.16168121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8128 >>8170 >>8181 >>8262

>>16167680

 

>>16168091

>Why drag him into it?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THIS EXACTLY

 

This story has NOTHING to do with Benedict Cumberbatch

yet…

his name is PROMINENT in headline AND in the url

if you read only the url it seems like it was him

vewy vewy interstating

doesn't that seem weird??

 

Might this be SEO optimization gaming to hide a much worse story about him?

 

When someone searches Benedict Cumberbatch they will find this story instead of the story that needs to be suppressed.

No sauce to prove this, but why the hell is that guy mentioned in this article that has nothing at all to do with him???

 

I'm betting he has a pedo scandal or something worse about to break in the next few days, watch for it…

 

Bonus, it may include these words:

pornographic scenes

recreate porn scenes

martial arts

groomed

Anonymous ID: 645155 April 27, 2022, 8:06 p.m. No.16168263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16168181

Happens all the time, SEO gaming.

Prolly called other things also.

Popular with hollywood creeps.

 

Benedict Cumberbatch might just be trying to get face time for his movie release, but, then why not choose a more benign story?

 

Maybe Dailymail is just being juvenile throwing unrelated big names into a story, but, why would an editor allow that? They would get a call from his lawyers probably. Any good agent would loose his shit if he read this. Story would be deleted in hours.