Anons, I have a theory. Shills don't make that much money, I assume, and they most likely have no loyalty, are passive aggressive and cowardly, require no facts to stubbornly defend their feelings and feel disgust at the sight of happy, well-adjusted people and can only be committed to a cause for extended periods by hatred and other personal negative qualities.

Conclusion: Red text guy is Red Text gal. Even a mostly soy infused male would be bored by now. The ability to stay focused on victimhood for this long must be biologically female.

>>16338991

Anons don't consider themselves superstars. So, whomever you are trying to insult, I'm sure, are deeply offended.

>>16339041

Did I say I was an autist? I possess a license to lurk and shitpost.

I simply responded to your use of the term Q Superstars. How am I to determine who you are addressing other than the term used by you.

A admit I did zero research into your post history and, in all honesty, I didn't even examine your dig exhibit. It was not my intention to trigger you to the extent that caused you defend yourself and to diminish me by assuming I exist in a cartoon reality.

My comment stands. Autists are anons, not all anons are autists and as far as I understand, the term "anon" is conferred to all with the exception of self doxxing, naive newfags.

>>16338997

I miss Toots, anon. The look of anticipation on kitty's face made me love and adopt him as my first virtual buddy.