Explain WHAT points are false and WHAT points are true, line by line by what the item is. This shouldn't be hard given that you have already discriminated the difference for each, right? Prove your assertions by at the very least engaging in defense of truths, before we even get to the evidence. It helps when people ANSWER questions that rightfully exist with MORE THAN A NAMECALLING DEFENSE and a claim of lies. Questions are not a fucking attack, and the moment you realize there is reason for the questions such as the QBQ question namely whether Q's board has moderatorship upon it contrary to Q's stated wishes, ownership of 2ch question like whether japanese court records show that you stole to IP and stole the money to host it as well as a SUBCONTRACTOR (ever thought opensourcing all paperwork of the deal as it was before what happened?), why you gave no warning and changed board ownership contrary to your own promises, maybe you'll get over the oppositional stance and actually prove your honesty, because I don't need to slide your boards to keep asking questions that you raise in my mind. >inb4 OSS
I'll give a hint for one line item. Either you lied when you said big boards would have significant discussion beforehand OR you had already had significant discussion for months or maybe even years beforehand thus you don't feel the need to answer that question because you feel like you have fulfilled what you said. BUT you don't want to SAY anything about that because the idea of an admin providing a service is supposed to not plan a removal of a board in secrecy with a closed group of people who are disgruntled and -NO ONE ELSE-. The fact of the matter is that you did this, factually, and you have no idea how badly it reflects lack of character, because for you to have merely greenlighted a plan that was already set up is plain to see by timing analysis. The usual excuse is that you had problems with the way the board was being run, which we no longer hear, why?