Anonymous ID: 94e06a May 31, 2022, 12:01 p.m. No.16375635   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michael-sussmann-not-guilty-special-prosecutor-john-durham

 

Well, isn't that just dandy

Anonymous ID: 94e06a May 31, 2022, 12:24 p.m. No.16375768   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5817

Seriously, what good is this Durham show?

If to wake up norms, well, they don't give cat hair rip.

Nobody cares but anons, so whom is this rocky horror picture show really for?

Anonymous ID: 94e06a May 31, 2022, 12:41 p.m. No.16375875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5890

>>16375810

 

Anon has considered that option.

 

Anon has also considered the option that Q is the enemy trying to cause the citizens to destroy themselves from within by making the conditions for mass insurrection, and violence. Q says that's what (they) do, but maybe Q is (they).

 

Or maybe it is exactly what Q said.

There's no way to know until it's over and done. Trust no human in high position. None. They didn't get there by being Mr nice guy.

Anonymous ID: 94e06a May 31, 2022, 12:49 p.m. No.16375914   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5923

>>16375890

 

>anon refuses to give up hope

 

I don't know about hope, but anon refuses to give up simply because of the sheer "just ain't gonna do it" factor.

If anons were wrong and all a bunch of gullible idiots then anon will just be a gullible idiot.

Not leaving. Gonna see it to the end whatever that may be.

Anonymous ID: 94e06a May 31, 2022, 12:53 p.m. No.16375944   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5963

>>16375934

 

>You and I both know full well that /qresearch/ only has a few dozen regulars at this point. Why would some 1pbtid like yourself be so hell-bent on convincing a few dozen regular schmoes in their 30s-60s to stop analyzing what's happening and take up arms in anger?

 

Well, this stmt ^^^^^ proves that there are many more anons here than just a handful.