>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michael-sussmann-not-guilty-special-prosecutor-john-durham
Well, isn't that just dandy
>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michael-sussmann-not-guilty-special-prosecutor-john-durham
Well, isn't that just dandy
Aye yi yi
Seriously, what good is this Durham show?
If to wake up norms, well, they don't give cat hair rip.
Nobody cares but anons, so whom is this rocky horror picture show really for?
Anon has considered that option.
Anon has also considered the option that Q is the enemy trying to cause the citizens to destroy themselves from within by making the conditions for mass insurrection, and violence. Q says that's what (they) do, but maybe Q is (they).
Or maybe it is exactly what Q said.
There's no way to know until it's over and done. Trust no human in high position. None. They didn't get there by being Mr nice guy.
>anon refuses to give up hope
I don't know about hope, but anon refuses to give up simply because of the sheer "just ain't gonna do it" factor.
If anons were wrong and all a bunch of gullible idiots then anon will just be a gullible idiot.
Not leaving. Gonna see it to the end whatever that may be.
>You and I both know full well that /qresearch/ only has a few dozen regulars at this point. Why would some 1pbtid like yourself be so hell-bent on convincing a few dozen regular schmoes in their 30s-60s to stop analyzing what's happening and take up arms in anger?
Well, this stmt ^^^^^ proves that there are many more anons here than just a handful.
Seems anon recalls a Q post or one-post poster that said something about most anons will leave or something to that effect.