why would 2 ip's have a majority of the posts in that bread? would that not, by definition, be spamming?
but what proof do you have that half the posts were deleted? i see 751 posts in that bread. do you have any screenshots?
no, it really doesn't. genuine anons don't post 100+ times a bread, at least not here.
you can't just make accusations without proof and expect anons to be behind you. sauce your claims. you have the board logs showing 2 instances of deleted all posts by IP, with no reason provided. that's not enough to support the claim that half the posts in last bread were deleted. do you think anons would have noticed? wouldn't the bread have lasted a lot longer if half the posts were deleted at once?
i am not religiously anti-spam. i cannot think of a single instance when there was a "massive drop" of a 100 posts in a bread in the past 4 years. can you? do you have any proof for that or is that another hypothetical? you can't base your entire argument on paranoid suspicion. i do agree with you that it's sketchy no reason was provided for the deletions on the board logs, but i have no other proof, beyond speculation, to support the claim that half the posts were deleted. go find the proof then come back here. that's what we used to do around here. we would come up with the theory, sauce the theory, and then provide it for all to see. now anons such as yourselves vomit out the theory without sauce, spam it relentlessly, and expect to be convincing. go do your due diligence, anon.
so now our only source of hard evidence no longer means anything? don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.