>>16480733 (pb)

(These posts continue the series of Ghosts in the Machine decodes from the last two days.)

This graphic is the third of six, but it also does not directly address the Ghosts video.

The big cat comms from the prior post point us to a sequence of Q drops that is not what it seems.

In that series Q notes that he made a spelling error, and then corrects himself to say there was no error.

I am sure many anons have come to suspect that many of Q's "spelling mistakes" were never mistakes at all.

But not all of them were meant to be "solved" at the time.

Some of them become "solvable" only with the addition of later clues.

At least that is what I think, so I became suspicious when I was looking back at the drops that day.

I figured that Q's nonexistent mistake might be a clue to dig deeper.

What I found is that in the very sequence of posts where Q is claiming the team cannot hit precise deltas, he actually hits two very nice deltas to the second.

One of these relates to "Marker [9]", to which DJT might have pointed on Friday:

>>16463509 (pb)

(I didn't even have time to watch that as I was working on this stuff.)

The other relates to the date 2/09, which many anons recognize.

My suspicion is that this delta was meant to be "discovered" at a time in the future that might be around now.

The immediate conclusion from the graphic is that Q team has greater technical abilities than Q has sometimes pretended.

I am sure many anons have suspected that, but here Q is giving us a direct display.

But these clever tricks with deltas are ultimately just pointers to further comms that will help "unlock" the Ghosts video.

>>16486223

This graphic is the fourth of six, but again it does not directly address the Ghosts video.

Also, the prior graphic focused on math, but this one doesn't.

I stopped short of trying to "explain" everything with words, since the graphic hinges on being able to intuitively "see" the connection between two Q drops that initially seem utterly disconnected.

To get there, watch the Promontory scene in the film, but also watch the Huron scene.

Q4564 was quite ingenious on Q's part.

He pretends to "explain" a prior drop in one way.

But in doing so he leaves clues to a totally different decode.

The next two graphics will pick up the trail from the last three and return to the Ghosts video.

>>16486237

I am pausing again.

>>16480757 (pb)

>Just lay it on us all at once.

>That way we don't lose our train of thought.

That is a good point, but actually with this set of six graphics I now think it is somewhat helpful to break the train.

The graphics form a chain that will circle back to the Ghosts video, but the graphics themselves are very different in various ways and maybe it is good to highlight that. (I was originally going to post them all the other day.)

Thanks for all comments, but not every choice is going to please everyone.

(Let me add that I realize that applies to agg site maintainers too… I probably seem harsh in saying that they botch 747, but of course they are making choices on styling and formatting for an entire site. If they had to "decode" every single drop first we would have no agg sites at all.)

It might be Thursday before I post the next set as I'm going swimming.

(I don't like to post anything without reviewing news, breads, etc.)