As in ignore everyone popular who says anything about Q? Wouldn't that be a reason to watch them closely to counter if they lie?
Thanks judge, jury & executioner. Seriously though, how would they know if I'm giving attention if I'm lurking & looking for flaws? I think that I can control my attention just fine, thanks for the advice though.
Best interp all day
That's not the correct twitter handle. Re_read it
IIRC, was signing with both signatures @ first, then exclusively Q. Context per post does matter, especially when looking for/@ double/multiple meanings.
Just looked again. Both Q sig & Alice & Wonderland sig were first used on Nov 2nd. I wasn't speaking on the other signatures in this context, only Q, and Alice & Wonderland. While we're on the topic though, an anon earlier today mentioned that some of those signatures at the time = [targets] (HRC, @Snowden, etc). I agree.
I won't make time for it, I'm sure someone pointed this out to her by now though
Thanks for the sauce. Had only observation & Q's words until anons brought the backing for what i suspected
>>1653958 ← Correct chronology !!!
>>1654051 That, I'll give you
The "BO, BV and bakers are AI, hell everyone who replies to me is AI so the board is comped" shill must be off duty. Got a notable & likely framed it by now. First-shifter, is he/it?
I hope you didn't tell all of your friends that Q replied to you, because um…..
>>1654070 KEkd again!
@ was already on a roll by that point, started using the trip on Nov 9th. No way wikileaks could compete
Isn't double a multiple (x2)?