You rely on Chelsea Clinton as a reliable trustworthy source for fact-checking??
That's worse than citing snopes as a reliable source.
If it exposes fake Truthers, that's great.
Expose the situation and the details that can be verified. Anyone who assumed anything without facts can only blame themselves. The way I see it. Our job in the Tucson AZ situation was supposed to be exposing the facts. Not making assumptions.
Facts:
Who is making the claim?
What is their agenda?
What evidence are they presenting?
Is it evidence?
What else can you dig up from public information?
These just a few basic obvious questions we ask.
Facts = solid, tangible, provable, observable, real evidence.
Somebody said so = not evidence.
Real Anons understand all this.
It's the idiots who flip out, make
assumptions, and look like fools.
Like when Q posted about
the HRC video and suddenly
half-woke dumbasses went
and posted all over the world
claiming that the video was a
sex video of some kind.
Nothing of the sort was ever claimed
or evidenced. But idiots will be idiots.
And I guess some people fail
in the critical thinking dept.