>He was referring to the B post on Qs board.
which got deleted as part of the babyfist Q LARP fest this weekend
the B post was deleted on Friday
same day as first babyfist Q
3 days after that post that you are saying refers to the B post
and not a "Q" drop
>He was referring to the B post on Qs board.
so when anon referenced "DROP #4954"
anon was referring to the post that violated Q's private board?
and was referring to that violation as itself a "Q" drop?
even though it was namefagged and signed with a "B"?
odd logic
doesnt follow
kek knows you are thinking about boobies anon
not biblical
not classy
five hail mary's
and polish your full armor of god
before you are allowed to post again
>you share a computer with Sgt. B, and files with Sgt. B, and a Hard drive with Sgt B. and a mission with Sgt. B.
thats called having a sockpuppet named Sgt. B
kek
>I have answered all these same questions before.
why did you delete you B post on /projectdcomms/ this friday?
>Oh so now it's Sgt. B. It was babyfist until he came here and BTFO'd your shilly ass.
babyfist = Sgt. B
they use the same device
they use the same hard drives
they use the same mission
they have never been pictured together in the same room
they are one person
and this person has been pictured together with Jim Watkins
in a hotel room
>Dan doesn't have it all?
trips 3's confirm 3 second dan doesnt see any difference between all of babyfists different larp accounts
Dan just see's babyfist
Dan see's all
>What would be the point of posting as Q
>Thank you for bringing more eyeballs to the board…
>I did not. the BO of /projectdcomms/ did
why did the BO of /projectdcomms/ delete your post?
>Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
>Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
>Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
Yes We were very clear when We ran a mission on /qr/
roger that
>Anons requested Q team delete it to prove they have access.
>Therefore they did.
you requested the person posting using the OLD Q tripcode during a salt rotation delete it, anon
I was there
I saw your post
and the CAP you saved of it
I asked too
this one is mine
the fact that we asked for it to occur has no bearing on it occuring
and the identity of the poster has not been established
>>That is not me.
never said it was
I sid I SAW yours
and I have seen the CAP you saved of it
you have posted it a few times
>this one is mine
this one is mine
>I have not posted any caps of something like that.
5:5
my mistake
I did see the anon you were referring to's post
that anon has posted their CAP a few times
back to the orriginal question
why did BO of /projectdcomms/ delete the B post?
Q wasnevershy to post about the technical specifics of his private boards creation/ confirmation of tripcodes
you say, "have to as Q team"
I say
why is Q team not making any reference to it
or making any attempt at re-confirming their identity after 1.5 year absence
in the middle of an un-anounced salt rotation
but I know how you will answer:
why dont you ask Q team that?
right right
we have
Dan Scavino (Q team) dropped the babyfist.png 3 times in a row
3 days in a row
so yeah
I think we got an answer
>Q is confirmed via pre-called delta with DJT with proofs created via anon interaction
>Formation of 'clean' board possible