Check the TS on New DJT
I think we are right.
Go check >>16542270 if you haven't seen it. How baker did not mark as notable is beyond me.
what if he posts the watermelon? kek
I'm sitting on the edge of my seat. I've been working to disprove or prove that Q has posting, of course we wont fully know until a zero delta happens.
Here's a scenario
What if the goal here is to prove this board is comp'd (idk how) in order for @Q to be verified on Truth.
Forces the MSM to ask the Q "who is Q?"
Anon has been working feverishly to get to the bottom of this mess and anon has also been invaluable holding the line over the last few years. Everything anon does is to help the community and the great awakening. Miss anon with that entirely.