>>16545748

>32bd48

No Flashing Administrator Flag

-this is NOT JIM until proven otherwise

>>16545748 (Jim?)

>>16545771 (also Jim?)

>>16545814 (also Jim?)

UID: 32bd48

does that fucking look like Jim to you fags?

>>16545878

I never said the text was not from Jim

I said UID: 32bd48 is not Jim

not until it posts with a flashing Admininstrator flag

holy fuck

just take EVERYTHING as gospel around here?

hey guise an ayylmao just flew over my house!

CAP THIS!

>>16545853

>FIGURE IT OUT RETARD

that exactly what I am doing faggot

>>16545865

o sht look at that

screencaps and shit

whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>>16545892

>I said UID: 32bd48 is not Jim

>not until it posts with a flashing Admininstrator flag

holy shit

I even….

MADE A CLAIM

care to refute my fucking CLAIM anon?

>>16545878

5:5

confirmed

Jim admits he is to pajeet tier to administrate a network

then

using his admittedly pajeet tier skills

he verifies Q for us

not using the IP hash

no, thats hidden by TOR

by using assumptions and conjecture

deleting B post on /projectdcomms/ confirms

I cant kek hard enough

>>16545895

>It's Jim's statement.

telegram seems to confirm

the statement was to ridiculous to take at face value withoutanysauce provided

like

we still do sauce around here right?

now, to the statement

what do you think about it?

Jim confirms Q by himself?

1.5 year Q absence magically coincides with Jims "accidental" breaching of opsec?

>>16545930

>but have SHIT evidence

UID: 32bd48 is not Jim

that is my claim

this is my evidence

NO FLASHING ADMIN FLAG

ergo

UID: 32bd48 is not Jim

claim has been presented without evidence

logically it can no longer be refuted without evidence

>>16545970

see, NOW you have a UID in this bread that is confirmed ADMINISTRATOR account

for fucks sake

your welcome anons

>>16545960

>you just got btfo

by a DIFFERENT UID posting with an Admin flag?

UID: 32bd48 isnt Jim, confirmed

>>16546036

this

its called a sybil attack

>>16546053

>a whole new boolean cond

i kek'd

>>16546058

>Think MAC address packet info.

try digging 3 inches down before posting retarded bullshit anon

>>16546062

> Maybe someone working for jim did something naughty.

Jim already admitted to doing something naughty

he was just in too much of a rush to get out to the uber important speaking gig in SoCal

but he just had to get that TOR posting patch into the live instance of 8kun

so he pushed a new patch into the live instance

and for a reason that has been given ZERO explanaition

a basic update of site code

magically rotated the tripcode salt

mere hours before Q just so happened to decide to return

-not notice the salt rotation-

becuase Q is pretty pajeet tier himself, amirite?

and then Q dropped with zero reference to all these last minute changes

using TOR

which had just been turned on

but also was not announced

anons?

seriously?

>>16546069

>did you see the t.m post?

I have now

what do you think about the content of Jims response?

Jim verifies Q now?

using assumptions?

ZERO SAUCE PROVIDED

???

is that how things work around here now?

>>16546101

I think you tagged my by mistake anon

the salt rotation

and then

rotating it back when it was noticed

is one of the biggest red flags of this whole fiasco

>>16546124

>people are searching so hard for Q and authentic proof but no one is searching for God nor any authentic proof

I alreadyknowgod exists nigga

the breath in my lungs and the beat of my heart is all the proof I need

>>16546142

>that is not q, so jim is just in it for the views

no

that is NOT what is being said

its like this

that is not Q

because there is no DELTA BASED VERIFICATION with DJT

howeveryou feel about Jim

Jim doesn't confirm Q

Q confirms Q

using delta with DJT

via anon interaction through the creation of proofs

>>16546145

>Guess, that OSS guy and the others are from the bad camp,

because, reasons?

>and the reason nobody is digging into it

>is because they prevent anons from it.

a mysterious "they" is preventing anons from digging onanysubject?

what in the literal fuck

what force in Gods creation could prevent the autistic anon from digging?

please

explain it for me

>>16546162

5:5 anon

>>16546165

>Last of the Mohicans.

feels like

we dont even dosaucearound here anymore

given theGRAVITYof what we are talking about

Q's return

and the verification therof

how can Jim make a claim of confirmed withNO SAUCE???

did Jim post -any- screencaps ofANYTHINGto establish ANY legitimacy to his claims?

>>16546199

>Drop the subject until such a time it can be confirmed or debunked with 100% certainty.

no thats okay

I will post what I feel like posting

free will and all

>>16546196

>all that garbage is jim not Q

because JIM is the one stepping up and making the CLAIM that he can CONFIRM the identity of this poster as being Q

I am not doing anything but RESPONDING to Jims explanation of the matter

as the website Administrator he has a unique perspective on the matter

and anything he says about itWILLbe scrutinzed by anons

>>16546220

>we had what 3 or so post

what about Dan Scavino social media comms?

surely oldfags remember Dan, right?

can ANYONE explain this series of posts from Dan

Each one coinciding with an element of the recent Q posts

first one on friday after the fist one

second one on saturday IN BETWEEN the ones on saturday

third on on sunday 4 minutes after Jim makes a statement about the issue using his flashing admin flag

any ideas anons?

Truth: https://truthsocial.com/users/DanScavino/statuses/108536460485249717

First Tweet: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1540888763341176833

Re-Tweet (deleted): https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1541078103769944064

>>16546239

okay

if it was legit newQ

why have there been ZERO fresh, organic baker bewbs (you know with the hadwritten post-it-note proof) in any bread since Q dropped?

I know it sounds ridiculous

but that is a legit metric

anyone following /chug/ and /uhg/ breads on 4pol should have a laugh

>>16546245

>I post shit to have it on record somewhere in the Universe

based

>>16546267

>Jim still doesnt address this:

not only did he not address this

he did not postanysauce foranyof the claims he made

Jim says:

I did "x" thing with the servers

so, we just take that as gospel with ZERO sauce/proof/evidence provided?

narry a single screenshot provided

>>16546270

>Accuse your enemy of what you yourself are doing.

what in the fuck anon?

what accusation did I make?

I asked what anons thought about the posts

I amdeZEROclaims about what the posts mean

do you have an opinion about the CONTENT of my post?

or just going to stick with

I am gay

which is confirmed, we are all faggots here

this looks coordinated

to your eyes, okay

and I am an "accusor"

what fucking accusation have I made?

>>16546311

>can not address any of the content in my post

>calls me a shill

5:5 anon

logical thinking always

the choice to know and all that jazz

>>16546322

>Please do the post

wrong anon

I dont do that shit

I have been known to fill drinks for anons on occasion

if you know me

you would know be by the moniker:

/barkeep

anons call me that for obvious reasons

but I am just a fag like everyone else here

>>16546325

anon

if Q is going to do a drop here

its going to be picrel

but it looks like you totally understand that

>>16546326

>After Jim's "explanation", I don't think daddy's coming back, anons…

Hurr Durr site admin "verifies" Q

am I doing it right?

holy fuck why is Q spamming about tripcodes

doesnt that nigger know the site admin confirms his IDEN?

ohhhh fuuuuu