TOR posters namefagging as Q Bread #20941
seems gay
seems dasting
seems gay
TOR posters namefagging as Q Bread #20942
seems gay
seems dasting
TOR poster namfagging as Q calls and gets [0] Delta with DJT
Q Delta [0]= >>>/qresearch/16551708
DJT Delta [0]= https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108558738138878885
Q requesting proof created = >>>/qresearch/16551922
Q pointing to exact delta timestamp = >>>/qresearch/16552035
>I never signed my messages with Q
5:5
I only included the TOR fags that were namefagging as Qandsignitured as Q
>TOR posters namefagging as Q
>TOR poster namfagging as Q calls and gets [0] Delta with DJT
TOR poster namfagging as Q trip verifies on /hivemind/ (I know, kek)
check the (You)s
>>>/hivemind/22376 rt >>>/hivemind/22373, >>>/hivemind/22374 ——–——– This TRIP will never be used again.
5:5 anon
attempting to make it clear/ succinct as possible
any recommendation/ critiques, fire away
o7
>TOR poster namfagging as Q calls and gets [0] Delta with DJT
>second anon created proof
ZERO DELTA Q
15 second Delta between POTUS posts first 2 posts
14 Seconds on the 0 delta
24 minutes between Fist 2 PDJT post and 0 Delta Post
0 Delta between Scavino and Anon that pointed out 0 DELTA, which could actually show it was SCAVINO that showed the DELTA.
And Q was the first one that pointed out the DELTA. Q literally made us go look for the proof because everyone ignored it.
>can u just in laymans term explain what you are trying to prove.
the only way to actually verify Q is with a ZERO delta between Q's post and DJT
start with that logic framework
the Q post has to come FIRST inside the 60 second delta, and THEN the DJT post
so we know Q posted FIRST,
not just sitting around watching POTUS social and hit the reply button really quick when POTUS posts
then, anons take a CAP of both posts
the Q post
and the DJT social media post that is 0 delta with it
and make a proof
then, Q tags a "correct" PROOF to confirm that was actually the correct set of posts that were being called out
THAT is how you verify Q
and it does not require a tripcode
it DOES require pre-calling the shot
Q posts BEFORE POTUS
and hits a 0 DELTA
that is the BASIC first step
then
Q has "called a shot" for the SCOTUS opinion on WV v EPA, calling it as 5/4 in favor
this opinion has not been released yet
future will prove past
ergo
when that opinion is released
and WV vs EPA is actually decided on a 5/4 margin
that will be FINAL proof that the poster that did the above things isactuallyQ
and not some fake and gay imposter
find any faults in that logic?
any more questions?
salt rotation has happened many times
the problem is
this time it happened with no announcement
and no coordination with Q
like is supposed to happen
picrel
>TOR poster namfagging as Q trip verifies on /hivemind/ (I know, kek)
trip verification post on /hivemind/ is a reply to anon created PROOFS
>>>/hivemind/22376 rt >>>/hivemind/22373, >>>/hivemind/22374 ——–——– This TRIP will never be used again.
>was looking into more why so many q posts you have vs whats in the dough?
I cant speak for the baker, anon
I just post what I find
>this is one hell of a posting proof
it really is
>is jim comped?
no one can no for SURE
but imho
FUCK YES
fucker says in his explanation he "doesnt know how whitelisting a tripcode works"
and then
in like the next sentence
he says that he can verify a given poster as Q
>the no-trip Q
TOR poster namefagging as Q absolutely had ONE tripcode
>Not sure if anyone caught the "Fist" reference.
sure did:
3 babyfist Dan Proof
Truth: https://truthsocial.com/users/DanScavino/statuses/108536460485249717
First Tweet: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1540888763341176833
Re-Tweet (deleted): https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1541078103769944064
>NEITHER A ZERO DELTA NOR A TRIP CODE
zero delta:
Q Delta [0]= >>>/qresearch/16551708
DJT Delta [0]= https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108558738138878885
Q requesting proof created = >>>/qresearch/16551922
Q pointing to exact delta timestamp = >>>/qresearch/16552035
tripcode:
>#QVerificationOrGTFO
TOR posters namefagging as Q Bun
>links!
>picrel
>anon [0] Delta proof 1
>anon [0] Delta proof 2
>TOR poster namfagging as Q trip verifies on /hivemind/ (I know, kek)
>check the (You)s
>trip verification post on /hivemind/ is a reply to anon created PROOFS
chek'm
>THESEare neither zero delta nor trip code you deflecting asshat.
Q replied to the proof they are in
do you think Q would tag a proof with FAKE Q posts?
>there was no post replied to in this drop?
I am referring to THIS drop anon
>why should I attribute the trip in that post to Q and not some TOR rando?
the (You)'s in the post caps the the hivemind tripcode Q posted
check the (You)'s
/hivemind/ tripcoded Q posted screencaps of the TOR poster Q on /qresearch/
those screencaps contain (You)'s on the posts
ergo
the /hivemind/ tripcoded Q poster is the same poster as those two TOR posts on /qr/
check the (You)s
>anything to add?
perhaps add this bun: >>16556958
to this notable:
>>>16556456 (You), >>16556470 (You), >>16556973 Unnoted Q Posts with PDJT 0 Delta?
>not a response to any post in that "drop"
I am not referring to the screencaps in that drop anon
I am referring to the posts that drop REPLIED TO
picrel