ZERO DELTA Q

>>16551708 <- Zero Delta post

>>16551514

>>16551922

>>16552035

>>>/hivemind/22376

15 second Delta between POTUS posts first 2 posts

Q posted FIRST and PDJT followed 14 seconds later

24 minutes between First 2 PDJT post and 0 Delta Post

0 Delta between Scavino and Anon that pointed out 0 DELTA

And Q was the first one that pointed out the DELTA. Q literally made us go look for the proof because everyone ignored it.

PDJT Truths ZERO @ 8:44am following morning

https://archive.ph/uawyQ <-Archive in case posts accidently get deleted

JIM WATKINS Q

POSTS ABOUT SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED 12 HOURS AGO, WHAT AN INSIDER.

Posts about Roe v Wade 12 hours after decision

Dan Scavino Posted BABYFIST 3x exposing the larp

>>16556827

When the bakers add it to notables and acknowledge it, then we can move on.

>>16556833

>Looking extremely desperate. kek.

Austin gonna have to get a real job soon.

>>16556875

>fucker says in his explanation he "doesnt know how whitelisting a tripcode works"

>

>and then

>

>in like the next sentence

>

>he says that he can verify a given poster as Q

>>16556956

I haven't IP hopped. suck my cock.

>>16557019

I'll give you a pass for admitting you were wrong, this time. Just keep those lips moist, in case.

.>>16557068

>And thank you for admitting you are a team of people with an agenda who are pushing this shit in concert.

Yes, I admit that we witnessed a Q poster get a Zero Delta with POTUS and are pushing it. You got me.

>>16557106

>>16557068

When you finally realize the people that say shill every single post are the actual shills

It really comes down to this.

Zero Delta Q got a Zero Delta and said Watkins is a comp'd bitch

Suddenly, Trip Code Q appears at 3:23 AM to make a post about something in the news 12 hours before that was blatantly inorganic.

Logic says Real Q called out Watkins, so they posted with Fake Q in response. Which is why the post @ 3:23 was the gayest Q post in history

hurr durr use your logic

witnesses witnessed the witness witnessing.

>>16557142

>A Q poster just said you were wrong. I just witnessed it with my own eyes! So I guess you need to pack it in now.

Was it this guy?

>>16557155

>>16557143

Another big red flag - The board mods/bakers are refusing to even notable someone claiming to be Q getting a 0 delta with POTUS and making a prediction on a SCOTUS decision. Why would they want to hide that so desperately?

>>16557169

> annihilating your argument

Things that never happened for 500 Alex

>>16557182

>The only 'red flags' are you dumbass obvious as fuck cringe shills dumbass pathetic narratives that have the same fallacious pattern over and over.

This is called SEETHING. Why so much anger over Q hitting a zero delta. Usually anons would rejoice. Almost like these people have their own agenda away from the truth.

>>16557189

>I believe Jim. I say case closed.

This is what Downs syndrome looks like in action.