>>16557753 (PB)
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16553188 (PB) (You)
>prove that Q has posted a screenshot of (you)'s before
I would have to do some serious scraping to prove that one way or the other
but as of right now
I cant
>prove that Q has posted an image with a screenshot timestamp in the filename before (from which you can derive OS and timezone - whether spoofed or not)
same as above
and I agree its anomalous if you are correct
>explain why Q said proof was coming after a zero-delta had already been established 4 minutes prior.
because anons create the proofs, not Q
and we had not created it yet
>was real Q taking a nap and didn't realize they had gotten the zero delta already?
no
it was a pointer to anons