dChan
Anonymous ID: 406294 June 30, 2022, 1:32 a.m. No.16563553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3595

>>16563454

That would be nifty if we weren't headed into a new ice age. AMOC is shutting down. The tradewinds will end. Northern Europe will freeze.

https://gizmodo.com/amoc-atlantic-current-collapse-1849028108

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210113120656.htm

So will the cowsfreezein colder climate?

These climate whackos will end up killing us all.

Anonymous ID: 406294 June 30, 2022, 1:58 a.m. No.16563633   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16563449

Had pondered this concept. Nigerians as a group are generally brilliant. Found this from the old E the Friend guy:

You may know the new Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as the judge who ruled against Trump asserting executive privilege in the January 6th case, or as the judge who put a stop to the rapid deportation plan, and that may have soured you immediately; but taking a closer look at her career; there is reason to think she may not be an entirely bad apple, despite being an avowed liberal justice.

Allow me to explain:

Depending on how closely you look, on matters of national security, you may very much enjoy her history of rulings.

For instance: in the landmark case of "Muckrock, LLC v C.I.A." she ruled that the CIA unlawfully adopted a policy of denial for any FOIA request for email records that didnt contain sender, recipients, time stamps, or subjects. In this case she found that the CIAs failure to produce the requested documents amounted to injury-in-fact and standing to bring charges. She also found their overall policy was in violation of FOIA regulation, forcing the CIA to adhere to the language of the codified law.

In other cases, for various reasons, she has routinely sought an excess of information from the government when ruling in its favor, preferring to request evidence in camera to support assertions.

In another landmark case, "Cause of Action Institute v. Internal Revenue Service" she ruled that the IRS could not claim exemptions from the FOIA act or that the courts did not have authority over the IRS to enforce the FOIA act itself.

-

These two decisions alone, were incredibly empowering for you as a people. One of them, ensured that the CIA had to comply with your requests for email records, regardless of you know sender names etc. The other decision forced the IRS and other agencies to comply with your FOIA requests, even when the records are not specifically government records, but are accessible to them.

Why does this matter?

Because in a game of constant, forced division we habitually boil people down to very minute facts we can judge them on. We try and simplify them. But when you are looking at a supreme court justice, it is important to study their entire career.

Hers is a very mixed bag, but not a dead end.