>>16729616 (pb)
>A newly created computer algorithm claims to be able to predict when a crime is going to happen a week in advance, and it’s been tested with 90% accuracy. - telegram
Ho ho! Viddy, viddy here my droogs, the DS millicents are telling the sheeple to get ready for the new "Pre-Crime" department! Horrorshow times ahead for the buiseboys!
Franchise it, anon. If there was just a way for anons to securely DM outside the board…
Hmmm…the ONLY country in the World bestowing potato with such an honorific!
As we just witnessed in Kyle's case, any attorney pulling such a stunt in a REAL court of law would at the very least be severely reprimanded by the court.
"Kyle Rittenhouse's Call of Duty Habit and Post-Arrest Silence Aren't Evidence of His Guilt"
"Judge Bruce Schroeder rightly reprimanded Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger for what he called a "grave constitutional violation."
BILLY BINION | 11.10.2021 5:18 PM
https://reason.com/2021/11/10/kyle-rittenhouse-call-of-duty-post-arrest-silence-arent-evidence-guilt-kenosha-wisconsin-thomas-binger-bruce-schroeder/
"Kyle Rittenhouse's Call of Duty Habit and Post-Arrest Silence Aren't Evidence of His Guilt"
"Judge Bruce Schroeder rightly reprimanded Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger for what he called a "grave constitutional violation."
BILLY BINION | 11.10.2021 5:18 PM
https://reason.com/2021/11/10/kyle-rittenhouse-call-of-duty-post-arrest-silence-arent-evidence-guilt-kenosha-wisconsin-thomas-binger-bruce-schroeder/
"The defendant's silence in response to a Miranda warning cannot be used against them.
Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976),( is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Due Process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment)
"Silence in the wake of these warnings may be nothing more than the exercise of these rights. In such circumstances, it would be fundamentally unfair and a deprivation of due process to allow the arrested person's silence to be used to impeach an explanation subsequently offered at trial."
https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-doyle-v-ohio