>>16770083 (pb)

Who is that magical "society" that you speak of?

>In my society

What's your society?

Why do you think anyone would want you as the head?

Why do you think anyone would want to throw away free speech and establish censorship?

>have society impose

What society?

You mean your judges that are pretending to speak for "society"?

All this is about YOUR OPINION.

What if everyone else tells you to fuck off with your Hitler-ism and censorship?

Would you live in the woods?

>Then even if a society has 100,000,000 peoples in it, that they want to restrict something

How do you know that 100 million people want to restrict something?

Or do you want to install your own mass media and indoctrinate your opinion into people so that they agree with your censorship?

Of course you wouldn't be bad, no no, because you know what's best. The other people are wrong, you are right.

Maybe they may even agree with Biden's weapon restrictions with enough mass media propaganda. Society would want it then, right? Or wouldn't that count?

>You would refuse people this right.

How would someone being against any censorship refuse any right?

You mean the right of some people to censor other people? That's not a right at all.

Just like here, you can personally filter content away, but that's on your end only yours and that's actually fair.

You can even call Jim all sorts of names and Jim won't ban you, because Jim is pro free speech and free speech is more important to him than not being insulted. You probably wouldn't allow that.

You think if a big government would just ban all sorts of content that you disagree with, that problems would be solved and that this would be great. It wouldn't be.

>>16770171

>can someone PLS fix whatever is preventing the pop-up window from opening when i hover the cursor over a post number from a PB?

When you take a look what's going on in your browser - when you hover over a pb/lb post link, your browser requests JSON data. Right now 8kun has disallowed JSON data requests, that's why you get a 404 not found back, and that's why it doesn't work anymore.

It's intentionally blocked.

>>16770216

>and the tax burden was LOWER than in USA

Who gives a shit.

Was there income tax in Germany before ww1?

And if there was, which people had to pay?

Is it good for society when they pay taxes to a corrupt (any) government?

>>16770216

>living in health, or those who are not?

Depends if you were part of the Nazi vaccine experiments, or not.

Also depends if you were considered part of T-4 "unworthy life", or not.

"Died suddenly and unexpected".

Sounds familiar.

>>16770276

>You reference "my opinion" as if that is a slur

No, it's simply your opinion, which I disagree with. That is all.

<one where society itself is healthy.

Who defines what's healthy to a society and what's not?

You?

Your experts?

Are vaccines healthy or not?

>A choice between a society that sees White women being treated like degenerate meat online

Women do that to themselves.

Did anyone force them to get smartphones?

Did anyone force them to install social media?

I remember a time where I was a nerd by just having a computer. Nowadays it's the opposite. I'm the "outsider" because I reject the digital crap.

I can, so why can't they?

Did anyone force them to make naughty pics of their bodies?

No?

Then what's the problem here?

You want to control what people do?

Do you want to establish 100% surveillance to get "your society" just like the current ones in power?

You are literally the same shit.

>Pornography is not the kind of speech the Founding Fathers were after protecting

Did you ask them?

Or are you making shit up?

>You can stick to our Jewish beliefs

See, you are retarded.

Everyone that argues against your shit, you call a "Jew". Do you think that works here? You have no arguments, just insults.

>>16770378

>You are

Good bye.

Also TL;DR

>>16770389

>pure fabrication

https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Institut/Geschichte/Bildband_Salon/1931-1940.html

The RKI works closely with other civilian, but also military agencies. Within the framework of this research, human experiments take place in sanatoriums and concentration camps, some of which are organized by RKI employees themselves, resulting in hundreds of deaths. Infection experiments with malaria, experimental typhus treatments, vaccination experiments with yellow fever, dysentery, paradontosis and typhus. "Eugen Gildemeister tested spotted fever

vaccines in the Buchenwald concentration camp, with fatal consequences," says Hinz-Wessels. He is never held accountable for this

Weird, that they weren't closed down either.

>>16770439

You prefer getting insulted and then wasting my time on nonsense TL;DR afterwards.

I don't.

Cope.

Welcome to the filter, you are using 2 UIDs in here?

Off you go.

>>16770456

>Nazi BS

>"it's"

What a surprise

>>16770500

>bla bla bla bla

TL;DR

Keep it short.

>"always allow X even if it harms, and regardless of the degree of harm caused"..

So you want to make suicide illegal as well?

>No, the destiny of society just gets taken more from my people's hands, and more into the hands of people that hate them

Again, you pretend that it's "the people" who have control, while in reality you are trying to push your will on others and then pretend that if that doesn't happen, other people would take control, while in reality your "Jews" didn't force anyone to do anything.

When a female wants to stay out of social media, she can right now.

In your society, she would be forced to stay out of it.

Is that better? No. It's worse.

You would make a great vaccine pusher too with the same script.

>>16770642

>It is in most Western nations

It's not, it would be ridiculous to make suicide illegal, because it's entirely a personal choice. What is illegal in countries is assisting someone else's suicide.

>But this is the point. Going your way you end up with even worse people in control

You are always pretending that someone has to be in control.

Why?

I want no one in control, because power corrupts.

>made clear it is definitely not the people have control

That wasn't about the status quo, but your imaginary society. You are ptetending that they would have control, while in reality you are pushing your opinions as if those were the opinions of "the society".

>Remember, you want society to choose an orientation

No, I want group-think to end.

I HATE it when "society" (what you actually probably mean is the majority) when the majority of people dictates what everyone else has or has not to do. That's democracy, and that's why democracy is fucking stupid and that's why the founding fathers didn't want that and it makes sense to not want that. It's a dictatorship after all. A dictatorship of the majority.

>Ensuring existence and (group) self-determination lies above individual rights.

NO.

FUCK the cancer that is COLLECTIVISM (aka Socialism aka Communism aka National-Socialism, which is plain socialism anyway).

Again: You would make a great vaccine pusher. They are using the same script of yours.

>You need to get the experimental shot, fuck your individual rights, it's for the "greater good" and for society

You pretend to be a good one, but you are exactly the same as the forces you pretend to be against.

>>16770732

>Remember what Operation Trust (cough) I mean Q said…

Why are you here?