Anonymous ID: e0d1e9 July 23, 2022, 11:29 p.m. No.16793341   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3343 >>3359 >>3360 >>3367 >>3405

>>16719524 (pb)

Ghosts in the Machine: Target is Comey

This is the first new addition to my rather lengthy Ghosts in the Machine decode (previously posted over multiple breads).

Here is the vid for reference: https://youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw

 

You don't need to read that to read this (although I do hope that you will if you haven't).

That was designed as a comprehensive whole, building from the easy to the harder.

This graphic is more freestanding.

That said, I admit I made it harder than I might have.

I actually stripped out more than half the "layers" (mostly text).

Sometimes making things easier makes things harder in the long run.

Really the only thing that you have to "know" is that Comey is called "the Cardinal".

But many anons do know that (and I used that in the earlier set of decodes).

Nothing else requires any esoteric overthinking.

 

The upshot is that it looks like the US Military is overtly targeting Comey.

I doubt that he has the mental capacity even to follow decodes like this, but I also suspect they want to crank up the panic meter to create missteps.

Incidentally (and Q has adverted to this), there is precedent for the military taking direct action against wartime enemy agents (such as with the Nazi saboteurs in WW2).

 

I will offer a word of explanation on how I figured this out.

For a long time I was puzzled by the fact that the Cardinal Pell drops overlapped the Chicago Christmas drops.

Even on the surface it is a dark and vile theme overlapping fun stuff.

But then the reality (as I grasp it) is that Cardinal Pell is actually innocent.

Here is a good overview: https://www.thefreedomsproject.com/item/610-the-persecution-of-george-pell

It seems he was a good guy trying to expose corruption and this made him a target of the Mafia. (Godfather III?)

Anyway, this rankled me for a long time and then things clicked as I worked on the Ghosts stuff.

 

So that's the decode.

As I noted earlier, I promised that I would do no decodes without offering a physical exercise update.

(It is the only way to force myself to do it, as I greatly eschew lying to anons, or having to admit I am an excuse-making loser.)

I have to say I am really liking the idea of progressively increasing the exercise difficulty (Convict Conditioning/Hybrid Calistenics approach).

You start with something that seems way too easy (e.g "wall pushups").

But then one thing is that there is NO EXCUSE for not actually doing it.

And then you are also able to focus on form, which you can't really do if you are trying to move all sorts of muscles and you don't know how.

It is a total uncoordinated mess no matter how much you grunt.

Don't think I am an expert… the truth is that I have failed at this MANY times.

(I have failed at many things many times, but that is how you learn.)

Anonymous ID: e0d1e9 July 24, 2022, 12:11 a.m. No.16793442   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3467 >>3695

DOJ Decode: Lisa and Peter are Whitehats

 

This is the most recent installment of an extended decode/dig on DOJ related topics.

So far it has mostly ended up focusing on Comey (who is a whitehat and probably Q).

But after a bit of a hiatus I am returning to the dig and here I offer evidence that Lisa Page and Peter Strzok are whitehats too.

 

Lisa and Peter were key figures in both the investigation of the Clinton emails, which led to Comey letting her off the hook, and in the subsequent "Russia Hoax" investigation that aimed to get Trump removed from office as a Russian puppet.

Of course, Lisa and Peter were exposed to mockery when their "love affair" and blatant anti-Trump bias become public.

As I now take it, that was the plan all along.

Hillary's exoneration contributed to Trump's win (as I have argued earlier), and the Russia Hoax was set up from the start to be a failed coup controlled by whitehats (as I have also argued earlier).

 

Many of my earlier posts focus much more on critical analysis of the evidence, although I progressively have more decode-style reasoning worked in.

Here I am starting directly with a "decode"… but I hope that those who have paid attention to the known facts will find it worth considering.

 

SPOILER ALERT

The graphic contains spoilers for the film Casablanca.

If you have never seen it, STOP and watch it now:

https://archive.org/details/casablanca-1942_202012

I think Lisa has pretty much overtly "outed" herself (and indirectly Peter) and that DJT confirmed this.

But you cannot see this unless you have a basic grasp of the plot and characters in the film.

 

Here is a guide to prior installments:

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/115742.html#115813 1: Opener, Analysis of Pence and Flynn

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116081.html#116087 2: More Pence and Flynn with Q-style "decode" graphics (featuring Ben Hur)

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/116971.html#117057 3: Comey as possible white hat, Analysis of initial HRC "exoneration"

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118116.html#118140 4: Comey's role in the 2020 election

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/118597.html#118638 5: Some topics from Comey's books

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/119330.html#119352 6: Comey as Q (?), BIG decode graphic with Battle of Midway, "Ramsey Rapist" and more

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/120083.html#120196 7: Small decode graphic re possible Comey tweet reply to prior post

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/121286.html#121494 8: Comey Jan 11 tweet decode

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15930724.html#15931065 9: More complex decodes integrating Comey and multiple topics from recent and distant history

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16001576.html#16001851 10: Decodes of possible replies by Dan, Devin and @q (TS) to Part 9

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16068706.html#16068993 11: Possible reply by Kash Patel

 

Note that many of these installments have multiple posts.

Also, I am well aware that some of the linked graphics will fail to load, and that you may see green text.

These are fixable problems and they will be fixed.

My focus right now is on forging ahead, but I also aim to respond to direct expressions of interest in any general bread.

But you might need to later look for a (you), as I am not always able to respond in a given bread.

 

Thanks to all anons who make this place work!

This decode is dependent on the work of SO MANY OTHERS, and you have my eternal gratitude.

Anonymous ID: e0d1e9 July 24, 2022, 12:57 a.m. No.16793578   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16793564

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16072548.html#16073087

(pb, Back to the Future decode)

 

Marty goes to the mall in the middle of the night.

Doc has turned the Delorean into a time machine.

He straps Einstein in.

Then Einstein gets disintegrated, but really he just makes a time jump and reappears.

Then the Libyans show up and kill Doc.

Marty jumps in the car and hits the accelerator.

 

I guess Dan got impatient: https://qaggregator.news/?read=TO24372

It took me a long time to solve this scene, but I bet I still beat the diversity hires at the CIA.

HA HA!

 

My favorite part in Nietzsche is when he ponders the joy of seeing your enemies burn in Hell.

Anonymous ID: e0d1e9 July 24, 2022, 1:48 a.m. No.16793740   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3748 >>3751

>>16793695

>>16793689

>==Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed].

 

>Lisa Page, attorney with the FBI's Office of the General Counsel - cooperating witness [power removed].==

>>16793695

Thanks, anon.

I think there has been a good deal of evidence offered up by both anons and Q team suggesting that Lisa and Peter… at least at SOME point… started being de facto opponents of the black hats.

MANY observed this….

I have quietly read the board for years, absorbing insights about topics where I was not the top expert, and this topic is one in particular where I greatly benefited from the observations of others.

"Q" is saying outright that both Lisa and Peter "flipped" as anons put it.

But my take is that they were whitehat actors all along.

I wasn't always sure about that (as you can even see in my prior decodes… where I insinuated that Lisa would need to pay the "self-penalty" sorry to her if she is a whitehat as I now think).

But I think the evidence now points to both of them acting to discredit the HRC email inquiry (so Comey could "act corrupt" and toss the election to Trump.. while reasonable observers could then say the whole thing was compromised from the start by corrupt agents) and then to show the baselessness of the "Russia hoax".