>democrats
unfortunate you cannot see
Part 4 of 4
Different Legal Strategies Are Not A Crime
The Soviet-style show trial has featured testimony from people in Trump’s administration who did not think it wise to keep challenging election results, particularly after the Electoral College had convened. I know and interviewed many of them for “Rigged,” my book on the 2020 election.
They found the post-election day legal efforts led by Trump to be poorly strategized and executed. I share details about some of those debacles in the book, particularly how Rudy Guiliani took a promising Pennsylvania case with superstar attorneys — about disparate treatment of voters — into a case about fraud, thereby ruining it. That decision also led judges in other states to get nervous and impatient about other cases.
It also increased anxiety among establishment attorneys who had previously been part of the legal effort. Many of these attorneys were also having their lives and reputations threatened by NeverTrump groups, who were posting personal information and sending mobs to harass them.
Trump administration officials had major concerns — prior to the election — about the lack of election integrity provided by the rush to widespread mail-in voting. For example, former Attorney General Bill Barr said in September 2020 that expansive mail-in voting was “playing with fire.” But these officials also believed it wasn’t really the job of the Justice Department to pursue investigations about the issue. They were willing to look into various claims that were swirling about, but considered it to be more of a local or regional crime issue that could rise to the level of DOJ interest…
The January 6 show trial has tried to suggest that problems with the 2020 election were thoroughly investigated. Evidence for the claim is lacking. Former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Bill McSwain has publicly said he was told by Barr to stand down from investigating, a claim Barr publicly denies. McSwain wrote Trump was “right to be upset about the way the Democrats ran the 2020 election in Pennsylvania — it was a partisan disgrace.”
He added, in a letter to Trump that was later publicized, “On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud and election irregularities. As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any press releases regarding possible election irregularities. I was also given a directive to pass along serious allegations to the State Attorney General for investigation — the same State Attorney General who had already declared that you could not win. I disagreed with the decision, but those were my orders. As a Marine infantry officer, I was trained to follow the chain of command and to respect the orders of my superiors, even when I disagree with them.”
Again, Barr denies this accounting. And he’s publicly said he did try to run down various allegations of fraud that were being bandied about.
Clark’s superiors at the Department of Justice did not want him to pursue his aggressive efforts, but he was also discussing the topic with their superior, the president himself. He tried to pursue a more aggressive strategy than the one that many DOJ officials thought prudent.
Reasonable people can see both sides here. Prudence — particularly so late in the game — is a huge issue. More tenacious fighting for election integrity is also virtuous. Many leaders up to and including Trump himself should have done far more — far earlier — to fight Democrats’ coordinated and widespread attacks on the integrity of the country’s election system. Many Republican officials were sounding the alarm in the months prior…
But differing legal strategies are not crimes, no matter how much Pelosi and Cheney and their media bootlickers would like them to be. It is reasonable to oppose Clark’s strategy, but the letter causing so much dispute was not about fraud. It was about the many other problems affecting the integrity of the election. It was also — and it says this clearly on every page — a draft product for discussion. The letter urged state legislatures to ensure the integrity of their state’s elections when there was cause for concern. The Constitution does give that responsibility to the states.
The January 6 show trial is also about covering up the truth of the 2020 election. Turning questions about the many problems with the 2020 election into a crime is the type of thing that is done in third-world countries. Persecuting people who talk about it or try to do something about it is what you expect in corrupt authoritarian regimes. It is horrific to see it happening here.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/the-j6-show-trial-is-lying-about-election-fraud/
Heidi Thauthage?.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/president-trump-suggests-pardon-j6-defendants-becomes-president/
President Trump Suggests He’ll Pardon J6 Defendants If President Again
By ProTrumpNews Staff
Published June 18, 2022 at 11:00am
RICO, they can't run out the clock.
BAKER COLLECTING
Lost Generation: Sex Without Marriage Equal Animal, Pregnant But Have Abortion Worse Than Animal
Source, More Info: https://humanitywhole.wordpress.com
You must use hard message and strong words to educate the lost generation.
There is no any other choice, it can only get worse and worse as the time going.
What is the point of having sex without marriage?
Well it similar to animals, it’s may ok with some people but not with the well educated and smart one.
Then you have people want to do abortion when get pregnant.
All I say is this group of people even worse than animal beings !
The lost generations that I want to call.
Where are the education?
You cannot have sex if you do not eat too much foods, that’s the basic rules of living but almost nobody know it !
Then if you want have sex use some kind of protection to prevent get pregnant.
Only stupid idiots people want to have free sex but do not want to take any responsibility about life.
If those people cannot have a care for themselves and their lifestyle, how can use expect them to care for the natural Earth environment are getting destroyed everyday by stupid plastics, artificial chemicals ?
It is stupid to see no any group/organization do anything.
Where are the freedom of speech, where are the hard message with videos or music or memes on the social media?
I don’t see any !
This society and civilization are going to collapse because of so called “comfort polite” message/information only, many censorship website don’t want to “hurt” the feeling of people.
But life can only be balance if both the negative and positive exist at the same time !
Best Regard,
The Savior
Source, More Info: https://humanitywhole.wordpress.com
To Support: /www.buymeacoffee.com/allhumanity
never promote bad behaviour.
only time to think.
Ban genital mutilation of infants!
https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Deutsche+Gesellschaft+f%C3%83%C2%BCr+Christliche+Kunst%22
https://archive.org/search.php?query=title%3A%28%2Agypt%29%20AND%20date%3A%5B1830-01-01%20TO%201945-01-31%5D
Jimmy
What if Q clearance anon was really Quantum anon?
buttgina catches infections while wishing for abortion rights
https://www.pbs.org/about/about-pbs/senior-management-team/
https://www.pbs.org/about/about-pbs/board-directors/
clickbait faggots aren't worth a fuck
lazy ass niggers have turned into the msm themselves
notable
Fr. James Martin says homosexuality is ‘the way God created a part of the human race’