Anonymous ID: 9d2401 Aug. 3, 2022, 6:02 p.m. No.16971842   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16971815

I remember seeing it and it was one of those triple negative type thingsโ€ฆ "vote NO to affirm the revocation of the added language"โ€ฆ I may be exaggerating by a layer, but you get the jist. Not sure if it was designed to confuse the result into the opposite of what voters intended, but gave me the superficial impression of such.