>>169109

>AT&T

Agree - we need to get in on this and get out there

>>170120

>>170342

>>170274

>This is the only DIRECT REQUEST made by Q.

>Q knows the game plan, and you may be fucking it up by not following directions.

Some of us are doing it - beats me why more aren't (besides the inane red herrings and sliding going on) - here are some more

>>170831

>>170807

The ones I have seen people post have been added (not yet the Apotex one from today) apparently there is a list here >>169315

I will update the spreadsheet with it.

>>170849

Also will help with graphics - any sector, let me know

>>170864

helpful, thx

>>170919

CORRECT LINK

https:// app.smartsheet.com/b/publish?EQBCT=6588bf56d814417bb759beca4fc52232

>>171073

GREAT - PLEASE CREATE A TOPIC THREAD FOR IT, thank you - it's good info but clogs up the general ESPECIALLY when Q is posting.

>>171106

>So now we use DuckDuckGo to cross-reference this list to the names in the EO.

Use the resources in this post >>4852 to get MAXIMUM info on people & their networks. The resources are all free

>>171108

>>171121

Now do you understand why the Russian lawyer lady was set up to talk with Trump's people to REPEAL THE MAGNITSKY ACT??

>Judo

>>171167

> I will surely start a topic and be flamed for it if/when more blinds of that relevance appear.

No you won't. That's the beauty of having an ENTIRE board! If you want us to be able to read all that and digest it, then a separate topic is the way to go, because no one is going to go looking back through the generals to refer to it. This way you can keep it current, and in one place so we can easily find it.

I would dearly LOVE to see some good graphics come from all that info - it is surely building a WEB ('map') of connections. Enty is an invaluable resource we should use. So please don't be discouraged, be pro-active and plop them all in a thread, we will make something devastating out of it - that's what we are here for.

and

F

for their victims

>>171179

I could not organize all the info on LOOP in my mind from the research thread enough to continue, but got these done - it's a start - if it can be organized in an outline, can go much further!

>>171196

> designate those abusers/corrupt individuals.

NOTE it does not say "prove" or those "convicted of" just…. designate them