I usually follow a Sherlock Holmes approach and utterly ignore whether or not earth is flat because as far as I'm concerned, it's never going to impact me. That said, something in your photos piques my interest. You said:
>Ask me about any of hem and I can explain what I used.
The majority of your photos, much to my bafflement, depict all of the planets in a red light. I didn't really notice with Jupiter, but Saturn has always been depicted as being this off-pale blue, however in your photo it is noticeably red.
I'm fully aware of atmospheric distortion of light, however, to my knowledge, the red hue given the sun is only when it's at a very low angle, but your telescope (depicted here):
Appears to be pointing up much higher in the atmosphere where the red light distortion should not be taking any direct effect.
I would be baffled if Saturn, on your telescope, appeared red in a near 'high noon' position, but say, the moon, didn't. In-fact, if Saturn did indeed appear red far above the horizon, it would throw some serious questions on a number of things (namely: is NASA accurately depicting Saturn, is this part of red-shift and would this have a major impact on the dating and distances of stars, planets etc).
As I've seen NASA dishonestly report on a number of occasions (EG claiming Gary Powers' U2 spy plane was a 'NASA weather plane' and going so far as to paint one in NASA's colours), I'd be most curious to hear your explanation.
Indeed, could you include the angle used for each planet for references purposes? It'd be pretty explosive if you just casually demonstrated that NASA has shown the planets as the wrong colour without even realising.