>>1708501 (LB)
It's reasonable to look at the the clock concept for the specific markers Q has called out.
The problem is people reading patterns into background noise. When he said "no coincidences" he meant it for things like plane crashes killing a witness just just before they were going to testify or POTUS tweets and Q posts in close succession. If you look at a large dataset from enough angles, without any thought of natural probabilities, you WILL eventually see connections that are really just coincidences.