>>17132799
It's a death shot. Don't need Q for that
>>17132257
VERY good question.
odds against by HUGE margin
was never going to happen.
but what if…
someone knew about dems & their software "vote counter"?
what if dems connected vote count machines to internet?
what if THAT was the mistake!
Out played at dems own game?
better chess players?
"russia russia russia" = plausible denial
dems can NEVER call out what maybe a "perfect crime".
oh, and if dems up the count machine s/ware in 2020, they get 81m, more than obumma & he had crowds! :-)
but I'm just spitball'n