no, that's stupid.. what a terrible precedent to trap someone mentioning conflict.. he's obviously guilty in the greater context of the global situation without including anything from this tweet..
Here he merely mentions that there is war going on that affects trade.. and he's probably demanding lower pricing in an attempt to diminish the oil & gas industries surplus financial resources in the name of an emergency.. but really just to weaken them, since they're surrounded by all sorts of strategic opportunity in this current political/economic climate