>looks like a claim
that Dan posted the babyfist.png 3 times
that is what the proof shows
does that looks like an assumption to you?
do you refute the fact that Dan posted the same babyfist.png 3 times?
>looks like a claim
that Dan posted the babyfist.png 3 times
that is what the proof shows
does that looks like an assumption to you?
do you refute the fact that Dan posted the same babyfist.png 3 times?