>>17193389

So >>17193726

1. all old trips no longer valid, because tripcode algo or salt were changed

2. someone created tripcodes until they got the one matching Q's old trip

3. they used it to post "as" Q

But

1. BO disagrees with this.

If someone created a vast number of tripcodes until they got the same as (old/real) Q then it should be recorded somewhere, surely?

Also who made the changes which BV Triple-A claims happened just before someone rolled enough times to finally get the same trip as Q?

Am I missing anything (answer is probably yes)?

Also in reply to >>17193770

Re "baby fist" google results

I was unable to replicate the google search showing that b&w photo as first result for "baby fist", it wasnt even on the top 3 lines, however I did get the b&w pic 3rd, top row, when I searched "baby fist bump." Can other anons check?

I am on desktop, this anon says it won't show on mobile >>17194457

Not that bothered, Q will either confirm or not, or others might clarify things later. Personally though am not taking the "baby fist" photo as meaningful since not able to replicate.