Q insurgency on Q Research vs Q counter insurgency on Q Research.
Two Q's one real one fake posting at the same time.
How do we decipher who is who at that point?
Shall we play a game again?
What do anons think? This has been on my mind all day.
you might be responding to what i tagged the other anon in but it does seem really interesting all this Dan BabyFist talk as comms and the same memes and formatting of text come up. Yes that is why i am thinking it is coordinated it is taking into account logically seems to be a word you care a lot about. Then to the accuser thing is a logical there it is again, step, if new q is fake, access had to be given to post to deceive, if deception occurred who are the suspects, then if it is a limited number of people that means certain assets may not be what anons thinks, that is the accusation at least to i think near the termination of thought, if this is the vector of approach this team of anons is doing.