If the photo had a 20 second exposure time
Why does the moving missile appear sharp?
Can you explain or not?
Since you are one of the rare anons that can follow reason and logic, can you help me with these issues?
-You cannot launch a missile without human intervention, no matter the hacks
-Exposure time is long but the missile appears too sharp, as if it was stationary for 20 seconds as the photo was taken (!)
Weather cams have that long of an exposure.
Had the exposure time been short, then you wouldn't see a BEAM OF LIGHT.
English please
>They are assuming that if it was not theirs, it does not exist.
This would be immature. Ironically that's the UFO narrative.
Thank you for the insight.
Nice! Now, do the weather cams do that automatically?
You have been conned. That is a pleiadian craft. This is a cover up article
Of a stationary object, yes :)
Why would a weather camera automatically process images differently for moving objects?
>there is 20 (or maybe 30) seconds of blurry stack upon stack of rocket plume, and then a fixed shot at the end.
Thanks! That's a good explanation.
That's an older pic but still a mystery.
Very good question.