>>1721106
Maybe (((you)))>>1721108
>>1721087
>Might be worth looking into. Wouldn't be the first time Q Team referenced a book.
'about a rescue'
JA?
No reason to think the date/time stamps are inaccurate
http://skunkbayweather.com/ -https://skunkbayweather.blogspot.com/
As reasonably 'original source' as we're likely to find.
Numerology is horseshit.
Massively complex events such as this don't have exact day/time counters - they have action and reaction, planning and exctution, then adjustments.
Which is also why (yeah I'm saying it) the Q-clock is also total horseshit.
Don't read too much into it. frankly I'm still on board with Dec 25 extraction theory. But hey, what do I know?
I'm just an idiot half-autist ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
>>>1721139 (pb)
>>What was the exposure time?
>>Normally missiles do not look like that.
How many SAM missiles have you seen fired then? Looks pretty solidly like a SAM to me
AB/AA/CIB holder as cred.
That shark is begging for a blond hair swoosh
Looks like swamp gas, smells like swamp gas, it's likely swamp gasโฆ (or notโฆ)
stop concernfagging
The second 2 are fake as fuck. Give me 10 minutes or so (and more desire to do so than I have now) and even my modest PS skills could produce a better, more convincing pic.
I love how many clowns on here seem to think it's possible - much less plausible - that you can tell the actual trajectory (in 3d space) from a single 2d image.
Really?
I meanโฆ fucking really?