>I have zero trust in Jim
Well, then I don't know why you are even here.
>I trust Q
Q obviously trusts Jim.
If you don't trust Jim, trusting in Q makes no sense, because everything literally everything on here can in theory be controlled or modified by Jim.
>was that place fucking "trustworthy"?
Ask yourself why Q went specifically here.
And Q also even said "disinformation necessary". Why do you trust someone saying that, saying literally that he, she it or they would lie?
In what do you trust in such case?
It would make more sense if you don't trust Jim nor Q. That would make at least some logical sense, but once again - I wouldn't be here if I didn't trust Jim.