>>17223836

>>17223883

I am aware. Was asking your take

2nd batch of drops was dasting sequence of drops. All from TOR. 1st of 2nd batch of posts seems super sketchy to me.

Q maybe testing different devices. Maybe proving comms to WW alliances, or they may be testing themselves

We'll obviously need a massive proof

>>17223836

At the top of every bread.

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

Fake news stories will not prosper.