>Matlock - a very smart man.
>
>Everything has meaning anon.
Think logically.
If Q's passwords are COMMs for anons or for the Deep State, could it be problematic?
Define OpSec.
Why is that relevant?
>Matlock - a very smart man.
>
>Everything has meaning anon.
Think logically.
If Q's passwords are COMMs for anons or for the Deep State, could it be problematic?
Define OpSec.
Why is that relevant?