Updated Quik Pic "How to Bake" Info
re-post
Most of the old Quik Pic series was made before deplatforming, when we were still using pastebin.com for pastes (now they censor, n/a).
Updated to include controlc.com and fullchan.net as pastbin alternatives.
SEE ALSO Baking & Noting Thread for more info.
E-BAKE INSTRUCTIONS USING CONTROLC.COM
"E-bake" = "Emergency bake"
No updates to notables or the dough are made, but anons can post in new bread.
Grabbing the Dough
STEP 0 Got the General image?? (Iwo Jima or similar)
''* If not, copypasta from Step 0 example.''
STEP 1: Find the Current Dough
Dough:https:'//'ControlC.com/c00f164a
''* Copy pastebin link into a browser window.''
STEPS 2 and 3: Copy the Current Dough
(Dough will appear in ControlC.com.)
''* Copypasta entire text into text editor like Notepad++.''
(Notice the PAGE BREAKS=== that separate the posts)
Creating the Thread
STEP 4: Find ''Create a New Thread" in the catalog or index
''* Go to catalog or index; Create a Thread is at the top (CAP 3).''
STEP 5: "Create a Thread" What to Do
''* Fill in THREE THINGS:''
Subject: [example] Q Research General #11039: My Bread Name Edition
Comment: [copypasta page 1 of dough–the one with the Q posts]
File: [copypasta image from Step 1]
STEP 5a: E-bake (~ 630 fast, ~670 slow)
''* Click "Create a thread"''. (5% of the time it will say "Posted" and appear right away–but not usually!).
This is called "thread hang" and happens routinely. See MP4.
STEP 6: Finding the New Thread & Finishing the Bake
''* Ignore the fake "posting 100%" message, WAIT WAIT WAIT 30-40 SECONDS for the thread to post.''
''* Open catalog or index in new tab; thread should be close to the top (catalog) or right after current thread (index).''
''* Copypasta the rest of the dough from the text editor into the new thread; if you get a "page too long" message, break the post in two & retry.''
Only one thing more to do: the dough post.
Dough Post
__STEP 7:
''Since you didn't change the dough, just copy the same link from Step 1 to create the dough post.''
''Label it something like "Old dough so it's clear it's a e-bake.
(If everything is copacetic, you can also go back to old bread and post a "fresh bread" link.)
CONGRATULATIONS
YOU HAVE JUST BAKED A BREAD!
(if things don't go quite as planned, remember: you're the one who stepped up, mistakes can be corrected!)
Use /tech/ board 8kun.top/tech/catalog.html for
appealing bans
asking tech q's
Remove QR Image
right click
open in new tab
right click on image
open inspect Q
go to burger, click choose right side (easier to see)
right click on highlighted node
choose delete node
close inspection
continue with out image, For the bread
will have to do it nb
don't know how to permanently remove, yet.
Delete QR image for one thread
simpler version:
right click on image in bread
select Inspect Q
highlight the HTML describing the image
right click and select "Delete node"
close Inspect Q
"Anon Digs": What's Really Notable
Bakers generally have a pretty good idea of the kind of thing that belongs in notables: well-sauced digs, articles, pf/boatfag reports, anon response fo current events, FOR KEKS posts and genuine Q proofs (often nommed if they're valid).
There's currently a new baker who's been notabling unsauced digs that supposedly show a meaningful relationship between Q posts and posts made by Pres. Trump or his family (or mil posts). He calls those anons digs and prefers them to other notables. He's also put board politics in the notes to stir up dissent because he wants the board different than it is now.
When asked what he's doing and why, he ignores the question and becomes abusive. He is not banned as baker. But has been relieved as baker several times as a result, see links below.
This is a new problem that apparently requires a RULE that most bakers will never need. Here it is:
Posts made to link Q drops to current events need real sauce (not just two images with zero explanation). The sauce should include a link to the post in question (from TS, etc) plus a description of why the two posts relate to one another. If timestamps are relevant, should be in Eastern Time only. Preferably they should be NOMMED by someone other than the baker at least once to be included in notables (even then, baker can say no).
These are reasonable guidelines most bakers already follow. A baker not even up to these minimal standards needs to either step up or step down. Anons who see a problem should ask about it.
If baker doesn't respond, it's legit for another baker to take over the bake. This may be easiest if there's admins around, but is justifiable with or wo/them. Next baker can either start a new thread or bake a new bread after claiming the bake once it's clear why they are doing it. If the notes are junk, best to someone to retrieve new ones.
All pb: