Anonymous ID: 00efaa Aug. 8, 2022, 5:44 p.m. No.17260510   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0875

Ok, chipping in on the Fake/not fake ruse here..

 

What if.. 8un is fully controlled by the white hats (by default that includes qresearch), is that not the most likely scenario given the fact that the bad guys have been unable to castrate the board??

(And it's not like they haven't tried over the years..

 

That would infer that Jimmy boy is in on the scam (knowingly or un-knowingly, which makes no difference)

 

And would logic then not dictate that the fake drops are in fact not fake, but faked to look fake…???

 

Why? To make sure everybody, I mean EVERYBODY starts paying attention again?

 

Hello Q!!!

 

Lovin the show! Need to run for more popcorn,

Keep it coming

Anonymous ID: 00efaa Aug. 8, 2022, 5:45 p.m. No.17260745   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0787

AG Merrick Garland Let BLM Rioters Off Easy Just Days Before Charging Proud Boys With Sedition

 

If you still had any question as to whether Attorney General Merrick Garland was using the Department of Justice to persecute his political enemies and place his political allies above the law, look no further.

 

From Jonathan Turley, "New York Attorneys Accused of Firebombing Police Car Given Generous Plea Deal":

 

We previously discussed the cases of attorneys Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman, who were accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail into a police vehicle in New York. They were facing domestic terrorism charges and the possibility of 30 years in jail. This week, the Biden Administration agreed to a massive reduction of the charges in a plea agreement that will likely result only in a couple years of jail time. What is particularly bizarre is that the plea agreement reduces an earlier plea agreement for a more serious offense.

 

The plea deal by the Justice Department is a breathtaking reduction in the charges and expected sentencing of the two lawyers.

 

Earlier, some of us were surprised that U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie upheld the $250,000 bail determination of U.S. Magistrate Judge Steven Gold. Prosecutors presented evidence that the two attorneys were trying to distribute Molotov cocktails and suggested that Mattis did not appear rational. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Brodie and the two attorneys were sent back to jail. (Rahman's bail was paid for by friend and fellow attorney Salmah Rizvi, who served in the Defense Department and State Department during the Obama administration).

 

Notably, Rahman and Mattis pleaded guilty last year to one count of possessing and making an explosive device, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Now, however, they will be allowed to withdraw the earlier plea and instead plead guilty to conspiring to assemble the Molotov cocktail and damage the New York Police Department patrol car. That is a nosebleed of a drop in the severity and punishment for this violent attack.

 

It is a sharp contrast to the harsh position taken by the Biden Justice Department on many of those accused of rioting on January 6th. Attorney General Merrick Garland cited the threat to police officers in pledging an unprecedented effort to charge and convict those involved "on any level" in the riot.

 

Conspiring to assemble the Molotov cocktail and damage the New York Police Department patrol car does not quite capture what these two attorneys did during the violent riot in New York. Rahman was caught on video throwing the firebomb and then fleeing the scene. Colinford Mattis was accused of having a store of firebombs in his vehicle and was videotaped as he attempted to hand them out to other rioters to fuel further violence. Rahman later was unapologetic and declared to reporters that "the only way they hear us is through violence."

 

That does not seem the type of the suspects who would ordinarily garner deep sympathy from prosecutors. Yet, the Biden Administration walked back the charges, unraveled the earlier plea to a lesser offense, and told that court that the earlier charges would have resulted in "excessive sentencing" for the attorneys. Instead, they are supporting a maximum sentence of five years with a recommendation of between 18 to 24 months imprisonment.

 

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63134