i was in same spot, still am but now my opinions are respected. I am with you, and i don't care if you don't care, i am still with you
that is what i am
[y]ou're coming off as Desperate & Unhinged
have a smoke break
The Bible quotes the Book of Enoch directly. So if the Bible is inspired scripture, then so too must the Book of Enoch be also. Any Scripture that speaks of the Son of Man, the Word of God, the Lamb of God, that was written before the birth of Jesus Christ must be inspired Scripture.
How do you explain words being used 1000s of years before the Bible was written that are recognizable to anyone who is familiar with Scripture?
Amulet of Tartaria circa 5000 BC
-
The Almighty God-The-Father, King of Kings and Lord of Lords
-
will fight in support of the Thracian Kings and Lords
3 while they shall be (true) Fathers to their people
-
and shall bring to him (worthy) offerings in substance and in spirit
"Almighty God-The-Father, King of Kings and Lord of Lords" written 3500 years before Moses was even born. How? Because God is real, and he has always taught his children. The words are not from man, they are from God Almighty. Which means that these ancient artifacts featuring the world's very first written language, are inspired Scripture.
The Amulet of Tartaria was worn by the Thracian Kings as a symbol of the covenant that God made with them. So long as they treated their people like a "good" father and follow God's commandments, then the Almighty King of Kings would defend them. How is this any different from God and the Israelites?
https://gab.com/SonOfEnos/posts/108400504280095547