>>17268382

impeach he who does not exist?

impeach the defendant?

I imply that how you refer to him during the impeachment is the proper way to refer to him now

he is in the WH. I think 46 does apply, which is not a statement on how legitimate he is

https://t.me/PepeDeluxed/26905

Ultra Pepe Deluxe, [01.07.22 08:03]

[ Photo ]

>>17268525

lmaooo my exact sentiment. fren, cheers old pal.