it's not about being nice to newfags or not, that's besides the issue of INFORMATION and CONFIRMATIONS.

it's about the fact that because of disorganisation and lazyness, we forget and lose the info we do have.

it's not just "dig, meme, pray".

also archives and proof/side-by-sides construction.

MEMORY.

ARCHIVING.

ORGANISING.

good graphics, not shitty stuff with colored lines thrown all around.

Q called us out on having bad bread: y'all focus on getting notables to be proud of yourselves, but the archives never get the love/sexy/glamour/attention they deserve.

it's been a problem for a while. still is.

anons, gather the best, make some better, or just go through the archives of what we have to find what we DO have already but nobody knows because it's not in bread and people don't read bread or archives and we sit around and run in circles. ¸

Godspeed

<Graphic form for each correlation a MUST.

<This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others.

>Do you think POTUS re-tweeted MAGA PILL for no reason?

>We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason.

>We believe in you.

>Q

>>1728302

there was a very good graphic a while back on NK, unfortunately don't have it with me…

photo of a bridge, i think… anyone?

>>1728332

>Where do most of the crop circles originate?

back when i was into them, southern UK was the main hotspot. Wiltshire, near Swindon, those parts. Lots of them.

>>1728361

it's a very interesting corner of Britain. Near stonehenge the famous, but also other lesser-known but no less fascinating artifacts. Ancient mound/pyramid, horse drawn on a hill, monoliths… Avebury, there we go.

i never quite cracked the case of the circles in general, though. But do agree there are different categories, some clear "fakes" but some not so clear… "real", however exactly they are made.

went over to spend a night in the fields… didn't see any lights, or a special event.

visiting one of the circles, i made a very small circle in a corner of the field, mostly to see how the branches fold/crack, how it reacts, just with my feet, no instruments.

that small circle was soon added to the archive site i often visited…

>>1728456

hoaxes and lies, even for good and with the best intentions, often go awry.

i've seen it happen: even when the truth is posted right there, first comment and many others below, the lie continues.

it really can feel like black magic, consequences out of control…

>>1728431

>Afraid of the rabbit hole time-wise, know it would be a months-long journey.

yup… so much docs, so much of it meh…

for me it was around 2008/2009, so details are hazy a bit.

but another unresolved case of "clearly something is happening here but normieland declares it to be nothing so we're stuck here"

>>1728533

>I think what's needed is

>normie

<normie

>normie

to stop thinking of and for normies.

Collect the best solid proofs that convince you, that convince us.

Focus on the info, not imaginary audience.

>>1728246

>>1728555

<Anons finally started to see

it was clear from the first time he was pushed here, many of us tried to at least slow it down (knowing it could not be stopped completely).

>>1728622

>they just jump to the crazy, instead of digging and researching

oh, no doubt a lot of that is intentional disinfo, too.

part and parcel of the global "conspiracytheory" hamstercage for our minds

>>1728626

true. Saudi Arabia Nov.3/4, with the indictments piling up, those are among the main points that helped cement this phenomenon as something to follow.

funny how the things that got the ball rolling and were central in the beginning are almost cast aside now.

even back then, anons often focused on lesser things like the DOITQ pic with debatable Q sign made with the thumbs-up (not saying it's not, but just not as convincing as real-world events).

>>1728706

is there a new proofs thread, or still just the ones we had already?

Q called us out on lame bread and we're slow to fix it, seems like

>>1728724

>if you hit a normal person upside their head they will NEVER listen or trust you

except when it's coming from the usual suspects/MSM.

>>1728745

>those who believe in conspiracy theories

any article/study that treats its subject matter of ConspiracyTheory as a unique consistent block self-debunks.

They show their ignorance and/or pretense: CTs don't agree AT ALL.

Not a community in the least, no agreement there.

>>1728754

>the only viable mission

again with the dig/meme/pray trilogy that conveniently forgets archiving and reformatting of info (okok, those could be read into dig&meme, fine).

you're not wrong, but dangerously close to lying by omission.

>>1728693

>Still, it was not enough to stop anons from following him.

shills don't always come with flashing neon signs identifying them.

>>1728846

the obvious ones.

but good cop/bad cop technique means while the MuhDick gathers all the hate, the subtle one really fucks things up deep

>>1728851 so

>>1728851 much

>>1728851 this

workfagging sadfag here, wish i could do more but also lots of burn out from months of this.

we have so much stuff, but spend most of our time just sitting watching the new posts go by.

arguing.

>>1552095 – Q proofs thread - proofs of Q validity

>>93735 —– Side-by-Side Graphics

>>1115338 – Advanced Graphics, Proofs, Maps, Side-by-Sides, Good Memes

>>4352 —— RESOURCES LIBRARY

>>4356 —— Tools and Information

just going through these to gather the best stuff could help a lot

>>1728910

how about just STOP THINKING OF AND FOR NORMIES, geez.

it's not about being normie-friendly, it's about having good info.

>>1728246

>>1728554