sorry for repost, but... not sorry, actually.

it's not about being nice to newfags or not, it's not about making the board normie-friendly, that's completely besides the issue of INFORMATION and CONFIRMATIONS.

it's about the fact that because of disorganisation and lazyness, we forget and lose the info we do have.

it's not just "dig, meme, pray". it never was just that, anyone who has read and re-read the crumbs would know that.

also archives and proof/side-by-sides construction.

MEMORY.

ARCHIVING.

ORGANISING.

good graphics, not shitty stuff with colored lines thrown all around.

Q called us out last night on having bad bread: y'all focus on getting notables to be proud of yourselves, but the archives never get the love/sexy/glamour/attention they deserve.

it's been a problem for a while. still is.

anons, gather the best, make some better, or just go through the archives of what we have to find what we DO have already but nobody knows because it's not in bread and people don't read bread or archives and we sit around and run in circles. ¸

Godspeed

<Graphic form for each correlation a MUST.

<This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others.

>Do you think POTUS re-tweeted MAGA PILL for no reason?

>We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason.

>We believe in you.

>Q

just going through these to gather the best stuff could help a lot to begin with:

>>1552095 – Q proofs thread - proofs of Q validity

>>93735 —– Side-by-Side Graphics

>>1115338 – Advanced Graphics, Proofs, Maps, Side-by-Sides, Good Memes

>>4352 —— RESOURCES LIBRARY

>>4356 —— Tools and Information

>>1729043

>>1728867 ))

how about not focusing on Wictor or MSM or Normies but on Q and the actual info dropped over months that we have but disorganized and focus-less.

we work on us, on the proofs.

the rest will follow

sorry to be hall-monitor-y like this: >>1729038 but workfagging and already spending so much time here, torn.

>>1729105

>The problem isn't Wictor. The problem is some anons misreading/overreading certain crumbs, having Wictor point out the fallacy, and those anons getting butt hurt and discrediting Q in the process.

precisely.

hence, >>1729073 , >>1729038

>>1729121 yes. But you don't prepare a dinner party by wondering what people will have eaten that day. You cook the food.

>>1729179

>It would be helpful if Q could confirm the proofs that have been created

does he have to repost them?

or go through the hundreds already done himself?

how about making a brand new thread

best of proofs

and see if he picks out something to confirm there

>>1552095 – Q proofs thread - proofs of Q validity

>>93735 —– Side-by-Side Graphics

>>1115338 – Advanced Graphics, Proofs, Maps, Side-by-Sides, Good Memes

>>4352 —— RESOURCES LIBRARY

>>4356 —— Tools and Information

>>1729231

>Right now, Wictor has it, as do a lot of other twatter warriors.

nope

>The proofs we put out have to be ROCK SOLID and irrefutable

yes

<by those that CURRENTLY have higher credibility than Qanon.

wtf you talkin bout

stop seeing yourself through the imaginary eyes of others.

focus on (y)our work.

nothing else matters.

>>1729233 well yeah but we could fucking help him a bit by reposting those we think are the best.

just having a new specific thread LINKED IN THE BREAD would be a start to do what he fucking asked

>>1729268

hey Rusty

thinking a new thread

Best of proofs

since there's a few already but everything is so scattered and unequal quality

godspeed

>>1729374

well to me the proofs are the side-by-sides, the digests of Q, the explanation memes.

this kind: ( >>1727844 , >>1727836 , >>1727827 ) olderbread

i've got plenty of them saved over months, but scattered and in no particular order.

guilty myself, i know, but was more focused on other mission.

like the

Qmap graphics… they are vital, indeed, but they tell the whole story.

proofs focus on single events/themes/connections

>>1729463

i'd say gather your best work.

some could be reposted here and/or linked in the bread.

sarcastic thanks for sliders discusing marjuana and hussein pic and others

thanks to anons trying to get this mission moving

>>1729517

workfagging (and it's killing me these days) and have only minimal archives with me, very little of those - didn't know/forgot we could create threads at comms, right.

pretty much all side-by-sides/proofs are things i saved from here, though, they likely are in the archives/threads…

WE JUST NEED SOLID HARVESTERS to gather what exists already

>>1729628

been trying to tell this to anons all morning.

focus on Q

focus on research

focus on the proofs

(but herding cats, etc)