yay! anon gets it. the simplest purest definition of communism is: from each according to their ability, to each according to their need. sounds like something Jesus would be in favor of. there is NOTHING in there prohibiting private ownership. there is NOTHING in there about an authoritarian gov't that owns everything.
not so long ago, kings ruled countries, and THEY owned everything. the peons who lived on the land and did the actual work were considered PART of the land, and were likewise the property of the king/nobles. that was CALLED a monarchy. gee, that sounds a lot like the "great reset" to me.
you can call a turd a rose, but it still STINKS. i like to use the ACTUAL definitions of words when i communicate. i BELIEVE that if everyone did so, it would avoid a great many needless arguments. i guess i'm kinda funny that way…